• BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    ast Friday, a Shanghai court found that the teenagers had infringed upon the companies’ property rights as well as reputation through “acts of insult”, noting that their actions contaminated tableware and “caused strong discomfort among the public”.

    Dipshit capitalist country more concerned with capitalists “property rights” and reputation than actual justice.

    If they deserve punishment make it among the public sphere e.g years of community services for the entire family or something. Isn’t that what the dipshits are so concerned about the “reputational” damage lol. So make them do something actualy good for society instead of debt slavery. Putting an entire family on debt $300k is an insane amount yet predictably some people will defend this shit.

  • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It is clearly an antisocial act that deserves a sanction that will be significant to offenders. Fuck the private property thing, pissing in other people’s food is fucking gross. I hope the fines are scaled to the financial situation of the offenders but in general I don’t think fines are the best way of dealing with this. You don’t become a more responsible member of society by having to pay a lot of money, you only become poorer.

    Personally I think a better sanction would have been some kind of community service combined with programmes for education, employment and hobbies/sports/etc. that sought to remedy the causes for their antisocial behaviour and reintegrate them in the community.

  • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Excessive fine, hopefully it was because the parents were rich or something like that. The article also says the 17-year-old kids were drunk.

  • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Disgusting. Well deserved fine, especially for the fact that they had the audacity to post it online. China is right to make an example of this sort of antisocial behavior before it becomes a trend.

      • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And what would you suggest?

        If they gave them community service, all the anti-China media would immediately be shouting about “forced labor”.

        The simple question is this: do you want China to turn into a shithole like the US or do you want it to remain a well behaved, civilized society? Sometimes you have to be strict with people who show extreme disrespect to the society and the people around them. Do you think the USSR tolerated extreme anti-social behavior?

        Especially with today’s online culture, as the government you have to immediately stamp out this kind of thing before it becomes some sort of “cool” online trend or “challenge” for the youth, if necessary by disproportionately harsh punishment to set an example. I’m sure if you look on Chinese social media you will find that most Chinese people not only agree with this, some are probably calling for even harsher punishments. People would be up in arms if the government did nothing.

        • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If they gave them community service, all the anti-China media would immediately be shouting about “forced labor”.

          Who gives a shit? They can say what they want and China will keep trucking

        • mudpuppy [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 hours ago

          that would definitely be a big improvement to implement rn without radical changes, but it still wouldnt be fair, youd still be sometimes taking money from someones rent and sometimes taking money from someones investments. it’s also punitive justice which doesn’t work. i dont think the government should intentionally hurt people

          • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 hours ago

            2.2 million yuan […] This includes 2m yuan for operational and reputational damage, 130,000 yuan to one of the caterers for tableware losses and cleaning expenses, and 70,000 yuan in legal costs.

            punitive would be paid to the state? “fine” and “fined” don’t show up in the article at all. not exactly sure where the other 200k are going

              • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                idk this seems like a situation where money can pretty directly restore a lot of the harm done and i wouldn’t trust those kids to work in the restaurant like the old trope of getting dish duty when you can’t pay the diner for your meal. Making them do a few thousand hours of “community service” doesn’t repair their victims.

    • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Unless these are rich kids, the specific amount is probably a bit excessive. It’s not really humane to keep someone in debt for a decade for something they did as a minor, especially something that, while certainly harmful and deserving discouragement, isn’t exactly arson.

      • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It also found that the teens’ parents had “failed to fulfil their duty of guardianship” and ordered that they bear the compensation, state media reported.

        This includes 2m yuan for operational and reputational damage, 130,000 yuan to one of the caterers for tableware losses and cleaning expenses, and 70,000 yuan in legal costs.

        Looks like it’s the parents on the hook for it

      • SwitchyandWitchy [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Exactly. The only way this doesn’t seem really excessive to me is if it’s like that €100,000 speeding ticket in Finland that made the news because they assign a penalty based on either income or net worth (I forgot which)