• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    You can’t block porn completely without blocking VPNs. If you connect to a VPN that’s all they can see. They can not see what you use the VPN for.

    • jim3692@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      You can’t block VPNs without blocking the entire internet. You can block known VPN services, but you can’t prevent people from hosting their own.

      Some known VPN protocols could be blocked, using introspection tools. However, this would just render corporate VPNs useless. VPN traffic is just bytes, and so is WebSockets. Good luck figuring out whether my HTTPS traffic is legitimate internet traffic, or masked VPN traffic.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Good news, we closed that pesky loophole by banning encryption without backdoors.

        If they can’t decode it, you better be ready to explain exactly what those bytes were!

        • ragas@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Check out my cool new protocol that looks just like I am loading a webpage about cat facts, which is actually a hidden VPN that I use to secretly look at webpages about cat facts.

          • jim3692@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            There is actually a technique called steganography, that does exactly that. It is used to hide arbitrary binary info inside images, while still fooling your eyes into thinking there is nothing sketchy there.

            • ragas@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I know! Nothing about all this is new.

              The only new thing is that the UK government is about to learn about those things.

            • piecat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Can’t it be detected? I imagine ML could be used to automate to some extent.

              • jim3692@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I didn’t say that it can’t be detected. I said it fools your eyes.

                Besides that, stop using ML for everything. My guess is that you need insane amounts of processing power for ML to detect hidden messages inside terabytes of live internet traffic.

                In fact, the algorithm for steganography is standard. It’s probably trivial to detect it, unless you add encryption and padding to the mix.

                • piecat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  “Stop using ML for everything”

                  I see no other way to drink from the firehose. We’re talking nationstate level resources.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Even if they go that route, and frankly I think they would get lynched before we got to that point, they can’t monitor every single connection. That just way too much traffic.

          That’s why China has a firewall, because that’s the best option they can come up with because monitoring every Chinese persons data is an impossible task. Their only option would be to go North Korea route, and just close the internet but that would basically end their economy.

          • piecat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Why do you think the telecoms got away with stalling upgrades and fiber roll outs for so long?

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              In China? I’ve read that sentence like six times I’m not quite sure what you’re alluding to, but China’s had fiber for about 10 years now. The reason they allowed it is because increasing everyone’s bandwidth doesn’t really make the job of monitoring them any harder. It’s still the same number of connections. Plus it allows businesses to be competitive on the global market.

              Also they kind of assume their firewall would work. Initially it did work, at least for the majority of people, but over time that more and more have learnt to use a VPN and now the whole thing’s a bit of a pointless exercise. There is a massive disconnect in China between the younger generation who use VPNs and the older generation who just consume state media.

    • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      VPN, Tor (and similar, like I2P), every imaginable P2P network, proxies, all non-http protocols (smtp, ftp, nntp, xmpp and other instant messengers and so on) can all transfer any kind of data, porn included. And a ton of other things. Heck, I’m quite sure there’s a minecraft mod where you can assemble JPG-images out of the blocks and view them that way. And then you can use stuff like uuencode where you can use anything that can move plain text to transfer binary data.

      There’s no way to block all of that unless you shut the whole internet down. And even then you can still trade good old playboy-magazines with your friends. VPN in itself has very little to do with the actual problem, beyond that someone apparently noticed that their current “save-the-children” iteration had pretty large holes in it.