MTGZone
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year ago

CNN: Pentagon considers tapping into remaining $4 billion in Ukraine defense aid fund

kyivindependent.com

external-link
message-square
6
fedilink
82
external-link

CNN: Pentagon considers tapping into remaining $4 billion in Ukraine defense aid fund

kyivindependent.com

Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year ago
message-square
6
fedilink
The Pentagon is considering tapping into the remaining funds in the presidential drawdown authority (PDA), even though it remains uncertain whether Congress approves funding to replenish these funds, CNN reported on Feb. 28, citing U.S. defense officials.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    They better start tapping soon or Europe will soon be sending troops to defend Ukraine and that’s going to cost the US trillions!

  • Mighty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    please remember that the next time they say there’s no money for healthcare or social services or schools or a pay raise. theres 4 BILLION accessible whenever the capitalist war machine needs it

    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Terrible argument. I think the Medicare for All estimates were like $32 trillion over 10 years. So $4 billion is barely a drop in the bucket.

      Better argument is that we currently pay more money to insure fewer people through our current system. Don’t get into their games of we have to give up X to get Y, because we definitely don’t. And Ukraine funding is imperative.

      • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Reminds me of the £350 million a week the UK was supposedly sending the EU in the Brexit campaign.

        The claim was inflated, but also they never intended to spend that on the NHS as was insinuated in the ad.

        https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/vote-leave-brexit-lies-eu-pay-money-remain-poll-boris-johnson-a8603646.html

        The sustained belief also comes despite the government having shown no sign of spending the supposed £350m extra a week on the NHS, as the advertisements controversially suggested.

      • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Best argument is that that 32 trillion is in fact the total cost over a number of years, not the difference between current system and medicare for all. Medicare for all as suggested then saves money, around 5 trillion, from admin costs and being in a better negotiating position for drugs.

        https://www.citizen.org/news/fact-check-medicare-for-all-would-save-the-u-s-trillions-public-option-would-leave-millions-uninsured-not-garner-savings/

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cost was never the real reason ever.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.36K users / day
  • 6.92K users / week
  • 13.7K users / month
  • 28.4K users / 6 months
  • 8 local subscribers
  • 23.5K subscribers
  • 21.6K Posts
  • 597K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org