cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/50323460
For more information, either visit the article directly or view the post with quotes in !crimes_of_ice@lemmy.4d2.org
cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/50323460
For more information, either visit the article directly or view the post with quotes in !crimes_of_ice@lemmy.4d2.org
Unless it significantly says existing public opinion and creates action I wouldn’t call it explosive?
I agree that the facts in this article are not excessively interesting. It’s just garden variety racism.
The real audience for this prelim injunction is not the public, however. It’s the 9 justices of the supreme court. In particular, there are 2-3 justices who appear to get all their facts from Fox News. And the evidence introduced for this prelim injunction is the ACLU’s primary opportunity to challenge the Fox News “facts” with “alternative” facts, when this case goes back up to the supreme court.