• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Be aware, very old people die from this as a secondary cause from a primary of Alzheimer’s and other dementias. They just stop eating. It’s a misleading statistic to use to identify poverty based malnutrition. It’s a very common diagnosis in terminal patients. And the way US billing works, getting the most diagnosis codes recorded is important for reimbursement. It’s likely the cause for this disparity.

    • hanabatake@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      I am french. I already saw these figures and tried to understand why it was like that. The figures might be technically correct but it doesn’t make sense to compare them with other countries. 5000 people dying each year of hunger, it would be revolting.

      We do not let people die of starvation in France, unless we think it is the best thing to do. We have this concept of “sédation profonde et continue”. Assisted suicide is prohibited in France. So people that suffer from uncurable decease can stop receiving food and hydratation until they die. They continue to receive painkiller or are even put in coma because letting them die that way is legal and considered the most human thing to do. A french christian newspaper wrote an article about it End of life: Are we really letting patients to die of hunger and thirst in France?. They are really opposed to assisted suicide and even them are OK with this process. So technically, we are letting people die of hunger.

      About people suffering from hunger, we have food bank to help them, meal costs 1€ at university… It is far from perfect but we are not letting people die like the figures would let imagine.

      About overseas regions, it is not that poor. The poorest overseas region, Mayotte, has been mostly destroyed by a cyclone two years ago. Both public services and NGOs thanks to a lot of donation reacted quickly to avoid famine. The situation is still bad but people are not starving.

      Hope I answer the question

  • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    You’re mixing two population averages, so you need a weighted calculation.

    Let’s approximate first: France has about 67 million people out of roughly 447 million in the European Union, so ≈15% French and 85% non-French.

    We set up:

    Overall EU rate = weighted average 1.7=0.15⋅8+0.85⋅x

    Solve:

    1.7=1.2+0.85x 0.5=0.85x x≈0.59

    So, among non-French Europeans, the rate is roughly 0.6 per 100,000.

    That’s substantially lower than both the French rate (8) and the EU average (1.7), which makes sense given how high the French figure is relative to the rest.

    thanks France, for ruining our numbers!

    • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      it says Europe though, not the European Union

      if you click the question mark near the Europe statistic, it says it also includes countries like Russia and the UK which mess with the statistic a lot

    • merdaverse@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Dunno what you’re trying to prove here, apart from “removing an outlier from the data makes the data closer to the average”, which is pretty obvious.

      But you can clearly see that the graph shows Europe, not EU, so using your same calculation with the population of Europe, which is 745 million and excluding France, the result is 1.13.

      Also I don’t see any indication that OurWorldInData is using an average of countries (which would be stupid). Considering their jobs are statistics, they probably know how to aggregate per population, aka a weighted average.

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    When they counted, they counted hundreds of thousands! We didn’t count therefore the number is zero, well done! The good and simple people of Starvation Land can sleep easy knowing that no one ever starves in Starvation Land

    • m532@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Usian nationalists might soon be telling each other this story, to feel less hungry…

  • merdaverse@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I see that some people try to attribute this to older population and/or Alzheimer, but even by those metrics the countries above are pretty close and wouldn’t justify such a big gap:

    As for the reliability of data, it’s from a peer reviewed study by an American university. If they had a way to make the China data look worse, I’m sure they wouldn’t hesitate.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You wouldn’t expect more (or less) primary causes if more secondary causes were reported in multifactorial deaths. I’d imagine the fact that in the US CMS adopted ICD-10 in 2015 and the rapid rise after would make that obvious enough. Unless you believe there’s some pre-COVID etiology for malnutrition that explains the rapid jump I’m not seeing.

  • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    There is no information on how the data is collected. Perhaps China labels the deaths as heart failure or some other cause of death.

    And like the other comments states, these numbers needs to be weighted for population.

    • merdaverse@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t have access to the source data since you need to register, but I would assume that OurWorldInData knows to aggregate Europe per population, and not just average the values per country. France is not the only outlier, there’s also Norway and probably some others I haven’t seen

      • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That fucking makes me curious as I am a Norwegian and hunger and malnutrition is not visible. But 10 in 100000 in Norway with 5.6 million totalt population is 560 people. But it all depends how deaths are reported. In Norway the norm is old age homes, run by the local municipality and there has been discussion how the food served is not the best. And how the residents doesn’t eat enough. Also you need more flavour to make food palatable for the elderly as you loose your sense of taste as you get older.

        How anyone can have infant malnutrition on Norway is beyond me. You have mandatory visita to health station at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (and 2 and 3 years) with consultation from physician and nurses. They weigh and measure and vaccinate. We got state sponsored prescription for hypoallergenic baby formula, so actual malnutrition should be caught. But I know that some immigrant communities doesn’t trust the system so they might be the numbers.

  • bigmamoth@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Isn’t malnutrition also englobe stuff as too much food and bad food ? Pretty sure a big portion of thoses are fat Americans that kill themself with food

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Putting the blame on individuals is wrong. Obesity is a result of endless advertising and poor regulation due to capitalism.

          • bigmamoth@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            So you think the main responsable isnt the ppl putting food in their mouth ? Or lighting a cig ?

            • pineapple@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              No it’s not. Evidently you have never had a popper addiction, I haven’t either but at least I’ve actually talked and listened to people to have. You can’t just decide to stop smoking or stop eating, it’s hard. If you could why would people willingly become overweight?

                • pineapple@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Oh interesting, I apologies. And I will change my opinion slightly, individuals do hold responsibility for their actions and they can make personal changes (wow I can’t believe I wasn’t saying that before). ALTHOUGH a persons views and personality are a result of there experiences. Highly alienated individuals who are bombarded with ads for junk food are more suceptibal to become addicted. So naturally that is why we see the US having higher levels of obesity. The government/rich people need to be blamed for this.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      How exactly is this cherry-picking? Communists wanting everyone to have food and be taken care of are entirely different from capitalists that want to suck the surplus value out of every worker. Horseshoe theory is wrong.