• CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I wasn’t too keen on that $70 basic version price tag in the first place, so thanks Randy. Can’t wait for it to be $39.99

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Countdown to him getting fired in 3…2…3…4…8…49…

    Because companies ultimately seem to love leaders that are toxic these days.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        24 hours ago

        He wasn’t the only founder and Embracer bought them in 2021. Later TakeTwo acquired the studio when Embracer had to restructure. They operate under 2k now so he can most surely be fired.

        Also probably why he is even more of a cocky cunt nowadays. He already cashed out.

        • Mortoc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I worked for Take-Two. The bankers that run that company absolutely see the world the way Randy does. Fuck’em.

  • tio_bira@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Considering i didn’t bother to buy anything borderlands related since Borderlands 2, it will keep preety muchbthe same for me

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Same, got 1&2 on a humble bundle. I remember one running great, and 2 bearable on a 1gb netbook att. Cell shaded games shouldn’t be this resource intensive!

      • tio_bira@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I still have my physical PC copy for the first Borderlands, it sounds almost a whole different world when i read 512mb vram recommended on the specs…

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Couldn’t have been less interested. Borderlands hasn’t been remotely interesting since 2 and everything since then has been a soulless cash grab.

      • massi1008@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hard disagree.

        Pre-Sequel, 3 and Wonderlands have all been great games that I had lots of fun with. I also know I’m going to have upwards of 100 hours of fun with 4. That’s what makes this whole story even more frustrating…

        But I’m a patient gamer. I played the previous BL games years after they came out. I’ll do the same for this one - not because I can’t afford a 60€ price tag but because articles like this. Sad.

        • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Wonderlands

          Interesting. To me that game was just the worst:

          Unskippable, long, very very very long, boring dialogues.

          Shitty weapons, but fantasy. E.g. no oomph feeling when you hit the enemy with a large ice explosions. It just scraps a little of their health.

          Boring, unchallenging fights.

        • TwinTitans@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          BL4 is awesome so far. Works fantastic on PS5. I hope next time they just skip releasing a PC version at all and use the extra resources for the other versions like GTA.

      • philosloppy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I played an hour of the first game and that was enough for me, so I’m not exactly their target demo anyways.

        • Rakonat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          First game was just Diablo 2 but FPS with guns. But I can totally respect anyone that didn’t jive with that. The humor was very hit and miss and definitely made but a group of people who insisted they were hilarious.

          • philosloppy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I honestly don’t remember anything about it except that I didn’t really enjoy it that much. that was a looong time ago

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    A “Pitchford” - the meme of Randall Pitchford always, ALWAYS being an ass. This isn’t anything new, just “fresh” again.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Guys who wear bowties are not smart, but desperately need people to think they are.

    • OmegaMan@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Bowties are fine for formal (social) occasions like weddings and parties. Wearing them around every day is weird. Wearing them to work is (generally) weird.

      Committing to wearing them everywhere and STILL buying pre-tied ones and not learning how to tie them yourself all while being a mega douche is cringe af.

        • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Finally, someone agrees with me on the fucking bow tie thing.

          Love the tie. Wear the tie. Talk about the tie. If you can’t tie the tie but you do the first 3, I can’t respect you.

      • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Honestly, I think he might actually fall into the category of cares more about appearing smart than being smart. Not to say he’s dumb, but I do get the sense the reputation is very important to him

        • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Celebrities with distinct looks almost by definition have to be exceptions to this discussion. Wearing a giant clock necklace to work would absolutely be weird unless it were Flavor Flav.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          i think it’s more about him having gotten used to it when he played a character on a children’s programme. he also has the face for it, which randall does not.

    • abcdqfr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      What french fuckin year is it where ANYONE feels the NEED to wear a bowtie?! You can just wear your boxers as a neckerchief if you like…

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    The reality is you made a game that few will play for several years. You could have made a game that could be playable on most contemporary machines. You didn’t and will now have to suffer from shitty sales due to your inability to understand that the majority of us don’t have the money to spend like you do you out of touch clueless ballsack.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Anyone that remembers Aliens: Colonial Marines and Duke Nukem Forever knows that Randy Pitchford is garbage. He also ran off most of the talent behind BL1 and BL2, which is why BL3 writing was shitty.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    The game is grossly overpriced and infected Denuvo malware. Those things are all symptoms of Randy Pitchford being involved. I’ll pass.

  • Greddan@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’re using a poorly made graphics engine and got scammed into implementing malware into their game.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s hard to consider an 81 on OpenCritic to be a trainwreck. People tend to buy games that review well, especially when it’s a co-op shooter with basically no competition.

        • Nima@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          bl3 is a fine game. its just critics of it are so very vocal that nobody feels like saying they like it.

        • Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Damn I had to look that up cause it seemed unbelievable. I am shocked it reviewed that well. It just seemed so awful to me.

          Am I so out of touch?? No, the children are.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Nah, that game’s great. The writing’s not good, especially for the villains, but people like that game because it’s good.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            You aren’t out of touch. Even the worst games don’t get that poor of a review. When you job depends on being on their side, it turns out you can’t voice an honest opinion.

      • CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I honestly don’t know what this “trainwreck” talk is. BL3 was passable. I didn’t like the antagonists, but the game played fine if purples dropped way too much and the new guns weren’t great. People make it seem like it was the Worst Game Ever and I don’t get it. The pre-sequel was hot garbage, but 3 was fine.

        • Nima@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          there’s no nuance in anything anymore. you can’t just say “oh this isn’t really for me, honestly.”

          you have to write 18 paragraphs about the fall of the video game industry because of this one game and how its hot trash, kills newborns while they sleep, etc.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        From what I hear from people actually able to play the game, it’s better than 3.

        Something like:

        2 > 4 > 1 > 3 > Pre-Sequel

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Was going to say… Who is out there buying games way outside their machines’ specs? Seems pretty straightforward.

      I do get a little annoyed at the folks angry at BL4 using a higher end engine. Like, it does look a lot better than previous iterations. That engine upgrade wasn’t for nothing.

      There are a ton of looter shooters floating around that aren’t using the Unreal 5 engine. Just play one of those instead. Hell, go back and play BL1. I’m pretty sure that thing runs on a toaster.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        This game goes into the twenties on a freaking 4070 at 1440 on high settings and doesn’t even get 60 at medium settings

        Now let’s take a look at the “recommended specs” Randy put out there

        NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 / AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT / Intel Arc B580

        Sorry but when in the world is that even remotely acceptable that you consider last Gen was outside machine specs when the developers said sure two generations ago is perfectly fine, which btw, holy crap it’s not.

      • CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have a 3090 in a 7800x3d box with 64 gb ram and I had to drop from 7680x2160 to 3840x1080 to get decent framerates. I get better performance in Star Citizen. After a few CTD’s I just went ahead and got a refund.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s a difference between a game being way outside of your specs because it’s graphically very advanced and your hardware is old, and a game just being unoptimized slop that expects its users to deal with by throwing higher specs at a fixable problem.

        I have a brand new 5070ti that can play all kinds of UE5 games with much better graphics than BL4 at 4k resolution with ray tracing at a decent frame rate without relying on frame gen. And I’m in the top few percentiles here.

      • Killer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        UE5 can run fine on older hardware, but most devs either aren’t given the time to properly optimize or don’t give a fuck about it and would rather rely on upscaling and frame gen tech.