• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Yes even in death he was disgusting.
    But more seriously, why are leading democrats so eager to say this was wrong? Which of course for normal circumstances it is.
    But these are not normal circumstances, and do democratic politicians think they still can use democratic standards to debate and reason and talk the extreme right down from systemic violence against minorities, when the MAGA crowd has destroyed democracy in USA and there are no remotely fair elections?
    Democrats continue to behave as if things are normal. But they are not! And even if they were, it’s madmen like Charlie Kirk that are the reason USA has so much terrorism, and school shootings.
    Also by Charlie Kirk’s own statements, he was perfectly OK with being a shooting victim, and that some people must die for the rights of the 2nd amendment.
    It’s not disgusting, it’s poetic justice.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      democrats should have just refused to comment. there’s no need to pretend he deserved any better, and there’s no need to talk about him

      Charlie Kirk? are you still talking about that guy? he was a creep

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        democrats should have just refused to comment.

        I absolutely agree, no need to comment on in, if it’s an internal right wing matter, which it probably is.

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m going to laugh so fucking hard when it turns out it was a right wing person that shot him