• RaoulDook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Saw tons of comments the last couple days about “Where’s the NRA to defend trans gun owners huh??!?”

    Well here’s your answer - they said 2nd Amendment rights are for everyone and due process matters. Sometimes being cynical is just hurting your perspective.

      • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I’m OK with the NRA not being hypocritical this time. Doesn’t mean anyone should expect anything from them.

        • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          32 minutes ago

          Yeah, I fully expect this to be lip service. They’ve been married to the Republican Party for too long, they have too much money they’re going to lose access to if they actually defend a trans gun owner who loses their guns or is denied a gun purchase.

          If I’m wrong I’ll be pleasantly surprised, but there’s a reason Pink Pistols is its own thing and not just a club run by the NRA.

  • collar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 hours ago

    First shot across the bow at taking guns away from Trump/MAGA dissenters and political opponents. They start with a group they don’t think will incite too many, particularly the generally pro-2A Americans. Next it’ll be gays, then anyone with any connection to antifa, then just Democrats in general.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    My sister is looking at rifles now to complement her carry pistol and my friend’s wife has OK’d him getting a handgun for their home from this news.

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We’ll see… first it’s trans, then it’s gays, then it’s immigrants and now the nra lost a bunch of customers. They’re thinking big picture.

  • TheLunatickle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Well obviously, the only thing the NRA has ever cared about is selling guns. They may couch it it reasons like freedom or safety but the real reason has always just been profits.

  • hopesdead@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    How long till they start legally labeling all trans people as “mentally deficient” or declare them all no longer citizens just to bar them from having guns?

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “without due process”.

    There’s their caveat.

    So if a trans person is arrested and adjudicated as being mentally ill, the NRA is totally OK with that.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You’re one of the largest and most powerful lobbying groups in the country. Let’s see them actually put that lobbying to work. Then I’ll believe they’re actually against this.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Nope, the “even” is important. The NRA supports gun control when minority groups are buying guns.

      In contrast to the NRA’s rigid opposition to gun control in today’s America, the organization fought alongside the government for stricter gun regulations in the 1960s. This was part of an effort to keep guns out of the hands of African-Americans as racial tensions in the nation grew. The NRA felt especially threatened by the Black Panthers, whose well-photographed carrying of weapons in public spaces was entirely legal in the state of California, where they were based.

      https://www.history.com/articles/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We’re over here thinking the NRA has noticed how much flack they still get for the Mulford Act, which was the previous time they collaborated to take second amendment rights away from a marginalized group.