• icelimit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t understand why they are publicizing this. Wouldn’t it be easier to ‘slip by’ under cover of night or whatever smuggler-esque strategies there are?

    • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      111
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The point isn’t to get supplies to Gaza, it’s to put eyeballs on the fact that Israel is preventing supplies from getting into Gaza.

      • icelimit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        49
        ·
        4 days ago

        So alleviating their suffering isn’t the objective, rather to point out that they are suffering?

        • bingrazer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think it’s more that one delivery is a drop in the bucket while achieving a constant stream of deliveries (e.g. the public puts enough pressure on their respective governments) could meaningfully address the problem

        • FishFace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          4 days ago

          The objective is to draw attention to the famine that Israel is causing by publicising how Israel blocks the entry of aid with a very tangible example.

        • 5too@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          4 days ago

          They just don’t expect to be allowed through. If they are, great! Then they’d do this again with an even bigger flotilla, and keep helping people as long as they’re allowed to.

          However, what they expect to happen is that they’ll be stopped. So they’re making sure they’re positioned to take full advantage of that, too.

          • icelimit@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I understand it better now, clearly there are others that didn’t like my question. I guess there are ‘stupid’ questions to ask.

            But regardless, the take for me is that they are taking more a ‘martyrdom’ sort of approach, which I completely respect.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          4 days ago

          They’re going to get stopped either way. A flotilla of 27 civilian ships isn’t sneaking past one of the most advanced, heavily armed navies in the world, no matter how “sneaky” they try to be.

          At least this way they’re on record for stopping the delivery.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          To point out its purposeful starvation. Israel claims they don’t have to,provide aid, it’s a war. This points out the hypocrisy that Israel are preventing peaceful aid. Israel are using hunger and famine as a weapon of war, to eliminate a people. Aka genocide and war crimes,

          • mrdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Everybody know that israel claims are BS. All leaders now that the occupying force has the obligation to provide necessities to the occupied

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yer they still receive support and they still block aid. This is to make it clear to those that don’t know, or that think Israel is within its rights to do so.

          • icelimit@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            By… Increasing visibility and pressuring the other governments to act?

              • icelimit@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 days ago

                I feel like in an alternate world, the mexican cartels find their humanity and use their drug subs to deliver aid would be a great story

        • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          So alleviating their suffering isn’t the objective

          I’m surprised a .ml account is saying this.

          Still, I’m curious if they have a real distribution plan should they make it through. I don’t imaging desperate people are going to make an orderly line, nor that the IDF will just watch it happen.

          • mrdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            While some people defend the Russian invasion of Ukraine in ML, I have never seen comments as disturbing as those on .world that defend Israel unconditionally and blame Hamas for the genocide. Some even go so far as to claim that Palestinians do not exist, and that the entire land belongs to Jews because God supposedly gave it to them, or based on other stupid ancestral arguments.

          • icelimit@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’ve seen this kind of stereotyping around - what’s this about different attributes associated with different Lemmy domains? I just made a random one.

            • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Tankie instance, but more relevant one that has a strong dislike of pragmatism when discussing leftist issues.

              • icelimit@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                It’s a tankie instance?? I just saw that the description was lemmy.ml, I took it as to mean the most ‘generic’ one. (Given that it is ‘lemmy’) Where was this extra description?

                Also I thought everyone was free to just choose whichever and there was no difference in the kind of accessibility or privilege to choosing one over another?

                • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  The .ml stands for Marxist Leninist. Not really, but that’s how they use it. It is a generic instance, but it does have that reputation.

                  I love their passion for issues, but their stubborn unpractical approach to solutions is frustrating.

                  • icelimit@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 days ago

                    Whaaat? Is there a list of other domains and what political agendas they stand for? Or what’s a completely politically neutered instance?

                    Also there definitely was nothing like that in the description. I feel like I’m being profiled. What’s going on

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      it’s a illegal blockage, if they tried to do it in secret it would 100% fail, it’s a humanitarian aid flotilla, not a military stealth ship.

      if anything the more public eyes on this the better.

    • altphoto@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      If they don’t, Israel could just say they didn’t know and just blow them up.

      • icelimit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        It seems like a gamble that both sides are doing - ‘blockade runners’ going to initiate an internationally effective response after they are illegally kidnapped, and that Israel is betting that no one can find the balls to do anything.

      • FishFace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        “Publicity stunt” is just a pejorative description of activism, in this case.

            • remon@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Sure:

              “Publicity stunt” is just a objectively accurate description of activism, in this case.

              • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 days ago

                If Israel does not let them through like last time then boom we have publicity of Israel actively denying food to Palestinians.

                If Israel does let them through then they get to give aid to people in need.

                So it’s either an aid mission or publicity stunt depending on what Israel decides to do.

                • remon@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Right, just that one of these options is highly more likely than the other. And everybody involved knows it.

                  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    So you agree that that is the publicity stunt part, which the activists can then use to shine yet another light on the evil that is the Israeli government.

                    Let me ask you this, what are you doing to make the world better or shine a light on things?

    • FarmTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      because they dont want to get there they want the headlines when they are turned away

      • TheMinister@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s not true necessarily. Of course they are highlighting the cruelty of the blockade, but I’m sure they’d be very happy to get in and see what’s happening—as well as distribute some food

        • FarmTaco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          yet they wont and they know that they wont. why not deliver food to the Ukrainian front? because they might actually get there.

            • FarmTaco@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              yet they send a flotilla of food they will be eating from into a blockade that will just take the food and send it on anyways. this is twitter theatre.

          • TheMinister@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            What in the world kind of thinking is this? Yeah, there’s a war going on and Russia is targeting civilian centers and are clearly the invading aggressor, but that is not on the same level as the full blown genocide happening in Gaza/West Bank. The fact that they could easily get into Ukraine and deliver food…means they don’t have to. What.

            There is an actual famine happening in Gaza. Starvation is being used as a weapon of war and attrition against the entire civilian population. There are only upsides to them trying this: either aid gets through and some people survive a little longer, or it doesn’t, and it proves to the entire world—that happens to be sitting on their hands over the genocide—that this is real and needs way more attention and pressure. What don’t you understand about that?

            • FarmTaco@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              news flash: they wont be getting into Gaza at all. so they could help people, but choose not to. this is theatre.

              • TheMinister@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                It’s attempting to break an illegal and genocidal blockade of necessary survival items. The fact that the blockade exists means they should respect it?

                Look what they’ve already done: started thousands of conversations about it. It’s already mountains more than you or I have ever done to help the people of Gaza. Your opinion is ridiculous. But it also shows how necessary these actions are.