Most of the time when people say they have an unpopular opinion, it turns out it’s actually pretty popular.

Do you have some that’s really unpopular and most likely will get you downvoted?

  • jsveiga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Dogs were hardwired by selective breeding to worship their owners. Not long ago they at least were loyal companions. You got one off the streets, fed it leftovers, washed it with a hose, it lived in the yard, and it was VERY happy and proud of doing its job. Some breeds now were bred into painful disabling deformities just to look “cute”, and they became hysterical neurotic yapping fashion accessories. Useless high maintenance toys people store in small cages (“oh, but my child loves his cage”) when they don’t need hardwired unconditional lopsided “love” to feed their narcissism.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Lapdogs have been around for thousands of years. It’s only very recently that they’ve been bred so extremely that they can’t breathe.

  • shrugal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    We have blown the concept of ownership way out of proportion. No one should be able to own things they have absolutely no connection to, like investment firms owning companies they don’t work for, houses they don’t live in or land they’ve never been to.

    • edriseur@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I like this idea, I had never thought about it this way. But it would be hard to implement, what about owning things that does not physically exist? (Like a company)

      • shrugal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yea it would be a pretty radical change, requiring adjustments in many areas. But I do think it’s necessary, because people not being personally invested in the things they own (just financially) and profiting from other people’s work is imo the big problem with our society right now.

        Companies would work the same way. You can own it (make decisions and get profits) as long as you work there. Ofc you can work for multiple companies, but with reasonably restrictions (e.g. 8 companies if you work 40h/week and 5h/week/company). I also think companies should not be able to own other companies, because companies cannot be “personally” involved in anything, only people can.

  • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Eugenics sounds really cool. Not the mandatory sterilisation style, but breeding superhumans? Don’t pretend that wouldn’t be cool.

    • KingBread@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Personally, with the advent of gene editing I think breeding “superhumans” will inevitably become the way of the future.

      It will likely only be available to those who can afford it and will create an even deeper rift between the “haves” and “have nots” than is already in place.

      CRISPR is a really recent development, and I don’t think people truly realize how earth-shattering this new technology will be. Natural evolution is dead for all intents and purposes and we stand at the brink of a new era where the reigns to our own evolution have been thrust directly in our hands. Shit’s gonna be wild.

  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    We don’t need more pronouns. We need less of them.

    In my native language there is no even he/she pronouns. The word is “hän” and it’s gender neutral. You can be male, female, FTM, MTF, non-binary or what ever and you’re still called “hän”. You can identify as anything you like and “hän” already includes you.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    People who are strongly against nuclear power are ignorant of the actual safety statistics and are harming our ability to sustainably transition off fossil fuels and into renewables.

  • YaaAsantewaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It feels like as soon as Biden got into office a lot of people on the left threw their BLM signs in the garbage and stopped caring. Now I’m starting to see more and more on the left detach themselves from people of color and go right back to the white worship they were doing before. Every single time a person of color is now a lead in anything there’s just nothing but endless controversy and both conservatives and liberals just complain

    But put a white person in a lead? Nothing but sunshine and “we’re starting to heal” nonsense

    Really sick of it now, and it’s completely soured me on wanting to vote again

  • CheeseBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Pansexual, polysexual, and omnisexual are all microlabels and are all subsets of bisexual. You don’t need more labels than gay, straight, and bi.

    Edit: I forgot about asexuals. But I specifically only care about bi subsets. They’re dumb, and you only need bi

    • cosmicsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Upvoted, but I have a slight disagreement. I think bisexual should actually be a label under pansexual. Bisexual doesn’t necessarily account for anyone outside the gender binary.

    • doggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      If we’re splitting hairs, bi should be a sunset of pan.

      Also, there is some need for a fourth “none of the above” label…

      • ougi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Is that really what you thought, or just an attempt at humor? Be honest ;)

  • TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Corporations should only be allowed to exist as long as they’re doing more good for society than the damage they do. Businesses should either be a net positive or run by people who are individually and jointly liable.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      as long as they are doing more good for society than the damage they do

      Isn’t that what profit is?

  • mub@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Except where actual safety is concerned, all information should be public. That means Individuals, businesses, authorities, governments, etc, should not be able to hold any information privately, it should all be freely available to everyone. There only private information is what you can hold in your head.

    Anyone who thinks about this idea for more than 30 seconds decides it is a really bad idea. I honestly believe that true information freedom will also free the human race, and that is the unpopular part. Everyone seemed to think I’m naive but people are just frightened kids and secrets are their first line of defense.

  • marksson@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m ok with paying taxes for universal healthcare and infrastructure. Welfare for anyone who isn’t mentally/phisically disabled (on various levels) can go to hell. No unemployment benefits, no state-funded child support.

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Universal healthcare would go a long way to improve all of the latter, however to play cause and effect; If you remove unemployment and child-support, you’ve inevitably now increased the homeless population and driven others to crime. How you do now deal with that?

  • kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have quite a few. I don’t believe in copyright laws or IP in general. I think it holds back innovation and exists solely to benefit megacorps like Disney or pharmaceutical companies.

    For example - you develop a new drug that really helps some people. You charge $50 a pill even though it costs you $5 to produce. Without the government protecting IP, another company will come around and produce it and sell it for $6 a pill, providing cheaper access to healthcare.

    People will say “what would give someone the incentive to make new things?” Without actually thinking it through. For a great example of how lack of IP is a good thing, look at how Shenzhen went from a fishing village to a Chinese San Francisco in a few short decades… one company will take the product of another and iterate on top of it.

    Another unpopular opinion is I’m pretty absolutist with free speech. I think certain things like calls to violence or intentional defamation of character should be restricted. But pretty much everything else should be fair game.

    I believe in open borders and think the US should return to the late 1800s style of immigration. We’re gonna need the population to compete with China in the coming century.

    I also think that the primary investment into climate change at this point should be preparing for the inevitable changes instead of trying to prevent the inevitable.

    • ChilledPeppers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree with the climate change thing. There will be inevitable damage, which we should prepare for, but if we don’t try and stop it, even if it is past the 1.5 or more degrees, it will just get worse and worse, until it exhausts our repairs and kills us for good. If we dont stop it even if late, it will spiral out of control.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Long distance vacations are irresponsible and selfish. We don’t have the resources left to be wasting it on frivolous activities.

  • p000l@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    People need to pay extra for their bodily excess weight. I’m done being harassed to pay for a kg more in my baggage.