• jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      Stein’s campaign says it wants nothing to do with Duke, the former American Nazi Party member.

      It’s one thing to be endorsed by an undesirable party, it’s another to accept it or even invite them to campaign with you.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          10 months ago

          Harris has her own share of problematic endorsements (Cheney, Gonzalez,…). Sure, they’re not explicitly racist, ‘just’ war criminals, but she accepted them and is actually bragging about getting them.

            • jonne@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              Why can’t she reach far to the left to get their support instead? If potential Jill Stein voters can lose her the election, she could see what those people care about and reach out to them?

              They would’ve probably been fine with a stop on sending offensive weapons while keeping iron dome stocked or something like that.

              Instead they’re trying to find the mythical voter that gives a shit about what Dick Cheney thinks.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  It’s literally a video by a pro-Democrat channel of Harris promoting the endorsements.

                  • LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    You two want to imply she actually wants to be associated with that bastard, whereas clearly she’s saying even that monster thinks Trump is worse. It’s obvious that’s what it means and you fucking know it. But for your agenda you’re willing to pretend she is pRoUd of it. I won’t get sucked into a thing with you so don’t bother writing a bunch of crap arguing how fucking proud she is

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Why do you think a literal Nazi would be honest in his public endorsements and not just doing it for tactical reasons?

          Think about it. Trump supporters gonna Trump. This “endorsement” is aimed at harming Steins campaign with moderate and progressive voters, as is evident with the reaction here.

          Now the question is, why he wants to do that, as it helps the Harris campaign. What does he think he gains from helping Harris?

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              So you claim Steins goal is to siphon votes away from Harris in order to help Trump.

              So the target audience of Stein under that premise are center/progressive voters. The target audience clearly is not Trump voters.

              So even if Steins goal is solely to siphon votes from the Dems, any vote that goes to her is a “win” for her. And the opposite, any voter deciding to go back to Harris is a “loss” for her.

              Him endorsing Stein is clearly aimed at achieving the latter. You said it yourself,

              Stein’s campaign exists solely to harm the democratic nominee

              So her target audience are solely potential dem voters. And these are alienated by that endorsement, as is also very clear in this thread.

              So there is two options:

              A - the guy is a total moron
              B - he is achieving exactly what he wants

              A seems unlikely to me, as nazi leaders are despicable and evil, but smart and scheming.

                • Saleh@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  So you agree that the nazi guy is helping Harris by him alienating progressive voters from Stein.

                  Then you have to conclude that he is just very very dumb, or you have to agree with my statement, that he wants to harm Stein and help Harris. Which brings the important question, what does the nazi guy gain from helping Harris?

                  As the guy was leading a large organization, him being dumb is unlikely. Him being good at scheming and manipulating on the other hand is very much on brand.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Source on Harris accepting a David duke endorsement? Else willful misinformation/trolling

        Edit though it can be confused because the article is about duke, this thread is not, and my assumption of commie’s correlation was wrong.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          You should read the comment chain before making non sequitur requests. It was literally two comments long. You couldn’t help but have read it before getting here.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            You have no idea how little I can read.

            I shall edit

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              I was judgmental for the original comment seeming to be in bad faith, but have an upvote, that was a damn funny response.

        • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          I was about to say that that isnt really much of an insult these days, given that its not really much different from insulting a republican by calling them “conservative” in some shortened manner and the cold war ended awhile go, but then I saw the username of the person you were replying to.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The rules are the same. They’re both trash.

      Cornel West 2024. Zero endorsements from republicans and other white supremacists.