Maturin [any]

The fact that a narrative like this can gain traction within Zionist media is actually interesting in the way it undermines one of the pillars of Zionist Ideology - namely the idea that Israel’s army is the strongest and best force in the world for fighting “terrorism.” To now say that, even during a complete war mobilization of Israeli, it is helpless against a terrorist attack somehow involving massive amounts of coordinated arson [I guess? ] has the propagandistic value of ripping the security blanket away from huge amounts of Zionist Jews.

Leviticus 18:28

And I think they still want the things he is doing and are in denial about the consequences (anecdotal)

post-war

Nazi Germany

At least they admit it I guess 🤷

A glass of wine with you, newacctidk

The union leaders protest when they close the missile plant 🎶

Thank you

Can someone reverse engineer what happened here for me? I really want to know.

Well I don’t know what to tell you then. All I know is that that account has been around for years and is not a human.

I think the info comes from bloomberg terminals

It’s a bot account that reposts bloomberg headlines automatically. Not a real person.

It’s a bot account that reposts bloomberg headlines automatically. Not a real person.

Removed by mod

He didn’t seem so bad on Gaza either, but two months later . . .

Your read of what he is trying to say makes sense. It’s in the context of people such as Netanyahu repeatedly making the claim that hitler got the idea of killing all the Jews from the Mufti of Jerusalem — thus implying that hitler wasn’t all that bad it’s actually the Palestinians who were behind the holocaust.

I think we need to abandon the “he is bad at business, look how many bankruptcies he has had” because it distorts what is really going on and also assumes that he is the same as what we were taught in school both about business people and heads of states/governments, which is a specious assumption. When we assume that the business owner’s goal is to have a successful and profitable business and, therefore, Trump is bad at being a business owner, we miss the fact that Trump’s (and modern finance capital’s) version of business is to suck the value out for personal gain and leave an empty husk behind, which they put into bankruptcy, leaving the creditors holding the bag. “Trump’s businesses failed” but Trump succeeded (the old Monorail scam).

Likewise, we assume that Trump’s interests with the US align with the long-term well being of the US. Like his bankrupt businesses, Trump can personally succeed while the US completely fails. He doesn’t care that he might lose a trade war or a currency war because the US and the US people are the losers in that, while he still plans to personally come out on top of whatever mountain is left in the aftermath. It’s just like all the tech-bro billionaires building bunkers to go live in in other countries - their plan is to leave behind a hollow husk of the US and take all their gains to their personal libertarian paradise. They still “win” even though the US and the rest of the people there completely lose.

Just going by what you quoted, since the lower court based its ruling on the harm suffered by those parties it probably has to reconsider the outcome again without those arguments.

They are probably saying that the former employees themselves are the only ones who can sue for being fired illegally, not people whose shit gets fucked when there are no people left to do the jobs they needed them to do