

If they were already targeted by the state then does this actually matter, does the English courts generally allow take backsies for “supporting terrorism”?
If they were already targeted by the state then does this actually matter, does the English courts generally allow take backsies for “supporting terrorism”?
I don’t think it’s always that so much as remembering how infuriating earlier wireless headphones were, every single pair I used to get in my teens lasted barely a year before something started making them unusable.
And compared to when wired headphones start experiencing problems there was way less of a dying period, when the wireless died it was just the end of the line right away, which sucks if you dont have the money to get another pair right away.
Something uniquely perverse about putting the sauce only on the sausages and none on the block of mash.
Makes it look like you want them to look like turds.
The show obviously couldn’t really have a “happy” ending, and if he just gets shot(on screen) or goes to jail that’s sort of expected of mob fiction.
Maybe a conventional ending could be good if we assume perfect execution, but for novelty and lasting impact it’s hard to say that it’s a bad ending.
The only imaginable bright spot is that the obvious attempt to groom his young son into a predator too happened so recently that there’s some hope that he might receive effective therapy for it before he becomes an adult.
Literally what is there even to say, fifteen women. And that’s just the number who spoke to his wife personally!
Also the most horrific shit he was doing literally like 2022, 2023, 2024.
Neil Gaiman is going to need to hire a private military for life to be able to walk the streets without getting three Luigis in the back.
It’s a common prosecutor folk wisdom that it’s good to gamble on the death penalty because if its on the table then the jury will be more likely to be filled with regimepilled sickos who vote guilty in the name of state violence no matter what.
Within the context of himself, not the worst look he’s ever had.
But it definitely helps that he’s taken off that dumbass ugly cap.
Reminds me of one of the main FOIA guys who runs “The Black Vault” for UFO shit being like.
“I trust the government and appreciate all their good works, I just firmly believe in the civic value of government transparency and disclosure.”
Probably my favourite kind of brainworms within the sphere of parapolitics, just a fundamentally endearing viewpoint to have.
I think a big part is that if you accept for arguments sake the fundamental legal premises and rules of a court trial in the Rittenhouse case, you can arrive at a conclusion that within that premise and those laws the acquittal makes sense. Basically that the injustice is enshrined in the bones of the system rather than a malicious and arbitrary dismissal of what’s supposed to happen.
Meanwhile there just is not a reasonable argument that a trained soldier would not be aware that extended application of a chokehold past unconsciousness would certainly be lethal, and that he continued past the point where average bystanders could tell that he was murdering Jordan Neely.
Theres no legal argument that makes sense in this scenario, anyone who accepts it are accepting it outside of the law.
Support for Daniel Penny is all but overtly just simple support for lynching, while Rittenhouse you can very torturously make a case involving other American brainworms like the right to self defense and the idea that a dumb fascist toddler like Rittenhouse earnestly feared for his life.
Predictably avoiding mentioning the severe reactionary cultural throughline of the manifesto.
Actually avoiding mentioning any politics at all, impressive. Perhaps this shooter is actually a liberal after all.
I really feel like even in this example tweet you really have to reach to argue this. Yes, all his complaints boil down to a core causation by capitalism, but that goes for at least half of any reactionarys political beliefs.
Several of the bullet points are just actually repeating dumb stereotypes, he probably only knows about Don Quixote because of Yakuza. He dedicates a whole bullet point to the societal consequences of conveyor belt sushi.
Genuinely just a reactionary fascist in his social views, it’s really easy to tell if someone has not read the manifesto past the opening if they try and argue that he’s either a leftist or outside of standard politics, cause basically his first complaint is he’s not allowed to use insensitive terms for women, black people, and asians.
Because of woke.
I remember watching a documentary on him and they had a montage of interviews where there was one environmental activist being like “He was right about all the stuff but he shouldn’t have bombed people.”
Which stuck with me for being very funny given that the manifesto is in service of justifying bombing people.
He just EDC’s a suppressed pistol and fake IDs for unrelated brainworm reasons.
The cops are amazed they only have to plant the manifesto and get to side hustle all the other incriminating evidence.
Judging by all the other stuff this guy is into I bet his reasoning is that he’s completely brainwormed on pickup artist redpill shit and thinks that the waiter interaction will give men chances to apply that bullshit and get laid.
Or a funnier alternative is he’s brainwormed on like trad romance media with like relationships starting out of being a regular at a diner or whatever.
This is the kind of environmental storytelling indie devs put in a game specifically made for a Jacob Geller essay.
It’s extremely funny to compare this to the menswear guy doing threads about how the modern Japanese(or at least Tokyo) urban environment is the only place small scale organic fashion culture can thrive anymore.
Also conveyor belt sushi is a societal plague worthy of one of 5 bullet points on your stupid little list? And the reason its bad is you aren’t chatting directly to a food service employee? Not just a weirdo but a really fucking stupid and annoying weirdo.
The NYPD truly is tutored in all the ways of the IDF.
I think they would probably just contest that logic, as that also would inherently define a huge amount of martyrs as being bound for hell, as well as a lot of da troops and shit like that.