InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agoTrickflationhexbear.netimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageTrickflationhexbear.netInevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNephewAlphaBravo [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoLess efficient use of aluminum for the same volume, too. They’re wasting material to do this.
minus-squareFlyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYup. And in most cases less packing efficiency too. Although in this case I think it is slightly more efficient
Less efficient use of aluminum for the same volume, too. They’re wasting material to do this.
Yup. And in most cases less packing efficiency too. Although in this case I think it is slightly more efficient