737@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoAncient news rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1152arrow-down10
arrow-up1152arrow-down1imageAncient news rulelemmy.blahaj.zone737@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareMidnitte@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 year agoI’m not sure, but he has some very… bad views on pedophile. Like… dude, why are you discussing this so much?
minus-squarewyrmroot@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoHoly shit why did this man spend so much time defending these despicable positions? …together with the dishonest law that labels sex with adolescents as “rape” even if they are willing, we cannot tell from this article… These are dangerous and disgusting views.
minus-squareRachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI mean from my pov it’s just a bad take or a lot.of bad takes
minus-squareMidnitte@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoAt a certain point, once you consistently take something, you own that something.
I’m not sure, but he has some very… bad views on pedophile.
Like… dude, why are you discussing this so much?
Holy shit why did this man spend so much time defending these despicable positions?
These are dangerous and disgusting views.
. . . Oh no.
I mean from my pov it’s just a bad take or a lot.of bad takes
At a certain point, once you consistently take something, you own that something.
Kinda suspect