MTGZone
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year ago

Trump’s $175M Bond Rejected, Filled With Filing Errors

politizoom.com

external-link
message-square
39
fedilink
231
external-link

Trump’s $175M Bond Rejected, Filled With Filing Errors

politizoom.com

Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year ago
message-square
39
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Toastypickle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not seeing this covered in any major outlets. Anyone got a reliable source?

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      1 year ago

      MSN has it:

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rejected-and-returned-for-correction-docs-for-trumps-175m-bond-get-bounced/ar-BB1l1Nf9

      The bond appears to be fine, it’s the attached paperwork that was rejected.

      "The cause for the rejection, according to the New York County Supreme Court website, is because the requisite paperwork lacked a current financial statement.

      . . .

      “It is also missing the name of his attorney-in-fact. Trump will have a chance to resubmit his request.”

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-forced-reveal-his-finances-save-his-properties-1886609

      • jeffw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So… not “filled with filing errors”… It was returned for correction because it missed an attachment, probably on purpose to conceal Trump’s property values. The original posts sounds like the actual bond issue failed somehow, but it was just the court asking for more details.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The bond is rejected and needs to be refilled.

          • jeffw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The bond was successfully issued. The court filling was returned so that they could add one attachment.

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              When you say the bond was successfully issued, it doesn’t mean much if it’s not accepted. If you read thr court’s note there is a list of items he must provide.

              • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                To eliminate the semantics: Bond good filing bad.

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I saw someone ask a question that interests me. If he submits his original financial statement, is that fraud? If he submits a revised statement, is that an admission of guilt?

    I’m going to say it probably won’t matter at all, but it amuses me to think he might have crafted a perjury trap for himself.

    • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not his financial statement they want, it’s the bond company’s.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If he submits a revised statement, is that an admission of guilt?

      He’s already been found guilty, admitting it at this point shouldn’t matter legally. IANAL

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh so he’s totally going to jail now right?

    Right??

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Aaaaaany second now…

      • Thteven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This gif gives me blue balls

        • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          As does the DOJ.

          • massacre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            Justice edging

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not one of the criminal cases, so, no.

    • satanmat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it just means they have to re do the paperwork

      But the darkest humor in this are the mistakes that keep being made by his team

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They were also hired because they’re conventionally attractive women, and they probably signed an NDA saying they won’t mention where he grabs them.

  • downpunxx@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    He didn’t include his current financial statement, lol

    • skozzii@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trust me comrade bro.

  • maculata@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Purposefully.

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s nothing to gain from this, though. If he fails within the deadline to post his bond he just gets his appeal denied. Hopefully. At last.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I heard people say something similar about the last deadline before it got extended and reduced

  • SaintWacko@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    So if he just keeps leaving things, are they going to just keep sending it back?

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Presumably they would continue charging penalty interest if they aren’t accepting the bond.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Also the deadline is what, Friday? Sounds like another delay tactic so he can scream about the rigged courts not accepting his bond if the deadline passes and James starts collecting on the debt.

        • athos77@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Was it ten calendar days or ten working days?

          • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            Doesn’t even matter does it? They will just keep breaking the rules for him. Justice is not only blind but hog tired or seems.

  • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dear white Jesus and Santa, please let trump file a fraudulent financial report as part of his bond filing. It would make me so happy. I promise to be good this year.

  • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Like everything else.

    Meaningless.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well it means Trump’s financials will become public. Meaningless to you, but not to him it seems.

      • baru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As said elsewhere, the bond company needs to share their financials. So not the Trump financials. This to ensure that the bond company has enough money for the bond.

        • Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, this boils down to “does the bond company have the money and was the bond issuer authorized to issue the bond”

          It will get interesting if they for whatever reason can’t provide these two formalities, but I’m not holding my breath.

      • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Won’t happen.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is who Trump surrounds himself with, opportunists who smell a buck and who know they don’t have what it takes to make this kind of money honestly, so they just wing it.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.49K users / day
  • 7.64K users / week
  • 13.7K users / month
  • 28.6K users / 6 months
  • 8 local subscribers
  • 23.4K subscribers
  • 21.4K Posts
  • 594K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org