• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Feels a bit like being told to do brain surgery and getting handed a hatchet, especially in the modern era.

    Like, its a great learning language precisely because it does force you to think about what’s actually under the hood of your objects and attributes. You actually have to learn what a pointer is. You actually have to think about memory usage and system states. Its like Bio 1 when they have you dissect a rat.

    But without a ton of library support, you’re doing so much heavy lifting. And with a bunch of library support… why not just use C#?

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      …do you mean C++ or just C? Cause, sure, you can poke around with pointers and references in C++ but it can also be used just like any other OOP language, whereas in C it’s absolutely necessary since it’s not an OOP language.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Cause, sure, you can poke around with pointers and references in C++ but it can also be used just like any other OOP language

        Fair. It is harder to break things in C++ than C. Although I’ve definitely created a few memory leaks.

        I’ll admit I haven’t actively fucked with C++ in over a decade, but in my experience you’re not going to find the kind of native integration with - say - Azure or SQL that’s baked into more modern languages. You can work around this with libraries. But eventually you’re just emulating a higher level language.