- cross-posted to:
- technology@beehaw.org
- cross-posted to:
- technology@beehaw.org
You must log in or register to comment.
Copyright and patent laws need to die.
They don’t need to die, they need to go back to what they used to be. The first copyright law was called the Statute of Anne and it covered a work for 14 years.
That’s a totally reasonable amount of time for an author/publisher to make their money. And it’s reasonable for creators to want to get paid for their work.
And then it should be public domain.
No, they need to die.
If you can’t protect your own ideas, you shouldn’t get to rely on the government to do it for you.
on todays bozo braindead takes.
How are you proposing that people protect their own ideas?
Say you write a book. You self-publish. A big publisher CTRL-C/CTRL-Vs your book and publishes it themselves with their access to distribution networks and advertising budgets. Now you sell 0 copies of your book while the publishing house makes millions.
What should you have done differently?
Copyright laws were invented to protect creative people against publishing monopolies.
How is the publisher making money if everyone can copy and redistribute it for free themselves?
Edit: Loving the downvotes from useful idiots. Keep getting taken for a ride 👍
I can’t believe people disagree with this point I am unable to explain. My utter lack of self awareness and critical thinking skills inform me that they’re all idiots, not I!
Yuuup.
You didn’t answer my questions
To answer yours, beyond what i already laid out in the question itself, the original Night Of The Living Dead has been out of copyright for decades, and yet corporations still make money off it.
How do they make money off of it?
Do they create their own derivative work and then make money off of that because copyright laws prevent people from copying and redistributing it for free?
I see that you’re an “output only” poster, rather than a “will actually disuss things” poster. Noted.
That’s a new record. Less than a day and you already have a tag on your account.
People can literally do that right now and yet the music, book, etc. industries still exist
People can and will do that Big publishing houses cannot, because of the litigational threat.
While I don’t uncritically support one side or the other, there are provisions for protecting the small and large alike, and I think there’s no easy answer.
Everyone thinks the problem is easy to solve until a specific incidence lands in their lap.
The litigation threat only exists because of IP law
Brain dead take
In the end, the fight led to more than 500,000 books being removed from the Archive’s “Open Library.”
In case you wanted to know what was lost.
I’m kind of amazed that only that and the 78’s archive was lost. At least there’s Project Gutenberg et al to help with the books, and meanwhile the IA does still archive a vast load of video material, software, and no doubt, other stuff.
I did, thanks.
How many of them are not backed up somewhere else?
I’m sure Anna has an archive or something
Most of them are still “on” the Internet Archive.
Reminds me of a certain emulation site that was hit by Nintendo’s lawyers and removed the download links for all of their games.
Except that’s all they did. The files are still there, the game pages are still up, all that’s missing is the big shiny download button. A simple userscript can add them back and let you download the “removed” games.
What criteria decided those books? It must be a relatively small number of all books
Is that Steve Wozniak holding one of those zeroes?
Not unless he became Asian. You can click on the picture in the article to make it full screen. Not Woz.
Alright, but even full-size it does look a bit like him.
A bit, but he’s quite a bit older and heavier at this point in his life. Looks closer to what he did 25 years ago.
