Wtf did i just read…

This is good actually, “privacy sandbox” is like baked in ad targeting service. Better to just block third party cookies. I’ve only needed third party cookies for microsoft 365 stuff.

That’s for editorialized content aka algo feeds

To complete your argument, quote the increase in residential real estate too. If there was a >=4% increase in residential floor space and number of units, the problem definitely lies elsewhere

Whereas what you say is true, there is a difference in the kind of inheritance. The kind of inheritance that the article talks about means that doing no productive work is in the optimal approach to getting rich.

You could just put it into the pack it came in, right?

Sounds like an ugly retrofit of bsd jail

lol @ India gets so much support USA started pulling down restrictions around 2009, and even after that it’s been transactional arrangements, rather than support

There a many traders acting as price finding mechanism for individual stocks. The situation you described is not so as evidenced by companies getting added to and removed from various indexes

There are other considerations too, like diversification, nuclear know how, load vs on-demand, local geoeconomics, etc

4 times for expensive is not too bad, big projects usually overrun. It’s even God considering the time overrun, which is shocking.

Thanks for the context!

As in if you inherit some assets valued at X, is it treated as an additional source of income for that year, or as a tax free gift?

I suppose inheritance would still be subject to income tax? Wouldn’t it be better to have more income tax slabs?

Umm actually, no because scientists are incentivised to be “nice” to each other for their career growth. It’s a set of circlejerks.

Section 230 protection also needs to be removed. Let civil cases take care of misinformation and such. Currently content aggregators take no liability in what they choose to show in the their feed. Between sorting chronologically and machine learning, there is a line to be drawn.

Reports should not downrank posts. It should notify moderators. Moderators can decide to add a mod comment, hide the comment, delete the comment, message the commenter etc. There can be tools under moderators control to automate this.

I do agree if it were not a single button the likelihood would be much further less. I would imagine ideally one tap to open a modal window and then one tap between ‘This is spam’, ‘This is harassment’ or type in Other : []. So maybe just moving the Create Report to where downvote button now is worth trying.

There is a fundamental difference between YouTube and Lemmy though - community members and community moderators. I think having a signal from dislike is much less needed because of it. However, I do think it would be nice (not impactful at the current size of community) to have a viewcount of some sort.

From a user interface perspective, I think it’s far less likely people will report spam than downvote when they do not like something. I suppose we both are only hypothesising here though.

I don’t see offsetting as a good feature. It just seems to drive people into tribalistic up/down wars. What’s the point of users seeing the net votes?

I suppose it makes sense if the change is lemmy-wide