They said this was going to create a rift among chuds. I was told I was being a bad leftist for not giving them the benefit of the doubt and seeing their humanity.
They said this was going to create a rift among chuds. I was told I was being a bad leftist for not giving them the benefit of the doubt and seeing their humanity.
Maybe not anti-list but the official position of most libs for years has been that Epstein killed himself because the mainstream media said so and anyone who claims anything otherwise is a kooky conspiracy theorist
That and it wasn’t just Clinton they defended, even when Bill Gates gave that borderline self incriminating answer to the interview question about Epstein the media just moved on and libs continue to treat any criticism of Bill Gates as exclusively coming from anti vax cranks (even as just last week Bill Gates had a private meeting with Trump and then proceeded to cut all his funding to democrats, rewarding libs slavish loyalty to him the same way Elon did)
Idk, “Epstein didn’t kill himself” was all over the internet, regardless of left/right. Yeah nobody ever did anything about it, but I can’t really blame anyone (except politicians) for that, because of course child sex abuse by the elite would be swept under the rug, what else can you do but say “yeah that obviously sketchy prison ‘suicide’ was fake as fuck”
Nobody defended Clinton though? Like who, when presented with the facts about Clinton and Gates, defended them? The line I’ve always seen the most was “lock them all up then”
I don’t think “switching places and positions without any of them questioning why or what they actually believe” is accurate at all in this context, because libs never had the anti-list stand that MAGA/chuds have now.
I agree generally but I’ve seen libs defend Clinton.
The closest I’ve ever seen to Libs defending Clinton was arguing that Hillary isn’t in any way culpable in his alleged crime, ignoring the fact she almost definitely knew and remains married to him to this day.
That and just ignoring the it.
Yeah, true, that was common in 2015-2016.
Sure there’s gotta be some, as there are toxic Democrats as well, but nowhere near enough (or at least not widespread enough) to parallel chuds and make such generalization.
Maybe not as many, but I honestly think that’s just because they’re focusing on Trump instead. I have a feeling if Trump was not part of Epstein’s circle that they would also just try to disregard the entire thing altogether to defend their party.
Why do I say this? Because Epstein is not new and I’ve been talking about Epstein and Clinton since at least 2009 and I had libs defend Clinton or just dismiss it as conspiracy theory. Now libs still don’t really mention Clinton but they do mention Trump, not very different from chuds criticizing Dems. And, anyway, it depends what you mean by Democrats because if we’re talking Party Elites then they’re all implicated “toxic” Democrats in this one who would rather go down covering this whole thing up. Biden had years to expose this, and even Obama could’ve released files they had on Epstein at the time, but unsurprisingly little to nothing was ever done.
IDK maybe I’m just still mad at the few libs I was arguing with back in 2019 before I found Hexbear
Even today I was happy to hear the boomer lib radio host I occasionally listen to in the car talking about the press conference but then when he got to thinking out loud about why Biden didn’t bring this up for 4 years and says “maybe he was too busy being a good president” I can’t help but lose my shit when I know that it was guys like him who threw the MeToo movement under the bus to paint Biden’s accuser as a Russian agent and that if Biden was busy with anything it was committing genocide and being senile
Wait fr? Maybe its because I lived in such a red state at the time but I never encountered this. Hell I was a lib at the time. Nuts if true