The woman thought to have the most direct knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein’s decades-long sex-trafficking operation claims there was no client list, no blackmail scheme and – to her knowledge – no high-profile Epstein associates who committed illicit acts in connection with the notorious sex-offender’s crimes.
That’s according to an account provided by Epstein’s convicted co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell to a top official of the U.S. Department of Justice during a highly unusual two-day interview session last month, according to a transcript and audio of the conversation released Friday by the DOJ.
After her interviews with the DoJ, Maxwell was moved to a Club Fed prison where all inmates are eligible for work release during their detention. The fact that she gave no incriminating evidence about Epstein associates, when it is plainly obvious to everyone that she has such evidence, shows that she was not rewarded for cooperating with the investigation, but for obstructing it.
Archive link: https://archive.is/yJTnv
That looks like a very clever comment. Could someone please explain it to me so I can also be clever?
That’s what AI generated content does.
Ah. Thank you.
My understanding is that there are two kinds of dashes. We’ll call one a regular dash and the other em-dash. The only difference is length. Normal typing generally results in regular dashes. A bunch of em-dashes is likely due to something puting in the extra effort to make those dashes long. If a document is filled with them, it’s likely ai generated.
There’s the hyphen (-), the En-dash, the width of an uppercase N, in the font (–), and the Em-dash, the width of the uppercase M, in the font (—). Most typesetters don’t use with the En-dash, as it’s virtually indistinguishable from the hyphen in body type.
I appreciate the explanation.