The U.S. special envoy to Lebanon said Monday that his team would discuss the long-term cessation of hostilities with Israel, after Beirut endorsed a U.S.-backed plan for the Hezbollah militant group to disarm.
Tom Barrack, following a meeting with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, also said Washington would seek an economic proposal for post-war reconstruction in the country, after months of shuttle diplomacy between the U.S. and Lebanon.
The USA and Israel certainly seem like countries that will keep their word and respect a deal once it is made.
Israel and Lebanon actually signed a diplomatic agreement in 1982.
https://www.nytimes.com/1983/05/18/world/israel-and-lebanon-sign-agreement-at-2-ceremonies.html
As part of the agreement, Israel would withdraw its troops from the country. Lebanon would prevent attacks from southern Lebanon.
The agreement was cancelled after violent riots encouraged by Hafez El Assad.
After decades of brutal wars, Egypt, Jordan and Israel signed peace agreements.
Peace has lasted for 50 years and 30 years. That’s actually a win.
Some idealistic people expect a single deal that will magically fix the following issues:
I hate to say it but the Middle East isn’t a place for idealism.
There is never going to be one agreement that fixes everything.
But removing an issue from that list and having peace would be huge win for Lebanon.
You have a very strange definition of “peace”…
That or you’re just intentionally lying. Israel hasn’t even existed for 80 years.