• Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Bet someone chimes in with “but the new one is better because it uses less energy”. I’m too lazy to figure the math on that but I can’t imagine that the 20% more energy usage of my old machine is greater than the energy cost of manufacturing, shipping, extra repairs (parts, transportation) that the new “better” machines need on 1yr to 18month cycle of fixing or outright replacing.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s not like the reasons new ones are more efficient is inherent to the reasons they’re more fragile though. You know how you can tell? Because machines at laundromats are just as efficient and don’t break all the time!

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I owned a laundromat. They are not efficient and cost a mint. The focus is on “wash fast, next customer please.”