gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agowakey wakey rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1225arrow-down124file-text
arrow-up1201arrow-down1imagewakey wakey rulelemmy.blahaj.zonegandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square10fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareblinfabian@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·4 days agowhen a deer hits a car it gets fixed. so hitting a deer with a car would fix the deer?
minus-squareBlueKey@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up15·4 days agoHmm, rather it is the inverse (or reverse?). Hitting a deer with a car breaks both. So a deer hitting a car repairs both.
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 days ago so hitting a deer with a car would fix the deer? no, it would fix dinner
when a deer hits a car it gets fixed. so hitting a deer with a car would fix the deer?
Hmm, rather it is the inverse (or reverse?). Hitting a deer with a car breaks both. So a deer hitting a car repairs both.
no, it would fix dinner