• CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They’re all going to bluesky because for some reason as soon as social media gets involved, the wonderful human ability to pattern match just gets switched off.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    A lot of our biggest communities still have like two mods taking care of everything and are prone to cherry picking. It‘s the same old forum structures where the internet bubble effect is just as strong if not stronger than on larger, already problematic platforms. Some of the things I‘ve seen and experienced lately bring back memories from those internet forum days. Good ones but also the worst ones. And I have to admit it makes me doubt the Fediverse is actually scalable. There‘s just a lack of accountability in the end.

    Which is not to say a federalized platform isn‘t an alternative to giant corporations. Those have their own problems and fair share of fuck ups. But I think I‘m already starting to see the limits of the Fediverse. At least in it‘s current stage.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The fediverse is much more than just lemmy. That being said i also disagree for lemmy. Drama between mods and communities was a regular thing on reddit. Still reddit managed to grow quite big before the bots took over. And companies are in no way more accountable to the users. Look at what happened with twitter under Musk. The only realistic choice you have as a normal user is to leave. And in the fediverse leaving a shitty instance still allows you to connect with all the other content from a different instance.

    • eta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The fediverse is about options. If you don’t like how someone else runs their platform or community you can create your own. It’s awesome because you don’t get locked into one platform. And in the future I think we will see more big companies and organisations running their own stuff. But I agree that at the moment it is not what “normal people” are looking for and it will take quite some time until it develops. But to be fair the same was the case for reddit.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I guess there is a hope that if more people join the Fediverse existing instances and communities won‘t just become more bloated but people create their own alternatives. However I have to say that I have no interest in running one myself. I‘m mostly here to discuss things that pique my interest. Running a community just isn‘t what I‘m here for and I‘m afraid too many people are just like me in that regard and we‘ll create an environment that‘s all too similar to Reddit.

        I also don‘t think it‘s good for the platform when people leave a community with a grudge to create a competition „with blackjack and hookers“ style. I want people to come and just create communities because they want to. That‘s where I see a future for the Fediverse.

        But I also wouldn‘t want to subscribe to 5 communities about the exact same topic because that would just spam my feed with the same threads probably. However I would actually like to hop between them easily so I don‘t stick around the same few people or have to abandon one for another. A lot would have to change about the way we interact with the platform (UI) and how it‘s connected for this to work though. I‘m thinking about subscribing to topics and it shows you a good mix of communities where overlapping threads are kind of stacked or something and you could swipe cards to see comments from different communities about it or something. This is a tough one to figure out. Might not even be possible at all.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I fear communities are lacking resources and structure to handle the masses. It‘s something corporations already struggle with but they house like 10000 times more active users. One way to go around that was mentioned above and suggested that new users may keep creating new instances and communities so a few places don‘t just explode in size. But from my experience, if a community already covers a topic, there won‘t be much competition and we end up with a power mod environment (Reddit) at best and instances going dark from overload (hug of death) at worst.

        But I don‘t want to sound too bleak about all of this. In the end these are challenges that someone might already work on.

    • nuko147@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      AfD Is Now Germany’s Most Popular Party For The First Time Ever.

      I wish the ‘Europeans don’t like Nazis.’, would be true, but we maybe just lagging behind.

    • tfm@europe.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Europeans don’t like Nazis.

      I wish this was true.

      Greetings from Austria, where a far right party is the strongest, although not ruling (yet)

  • arakhis_@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    remember 80% of instagram is bots according to a study reported by german media.

    so X id even say it could be more giving the vast hatred increase and content change over the last years. so basically they lost 90%%

      • Bongles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Anecdotally, I watch reels on Instagram (i know) and the vast majority of meme pages that it shows me are the exact same setup around a slightly different premise, with the same purchased comments pinned from the same accounts or the accounts comment saying something like they’re too broke for paid comments please like.

        80% is probably high but I wouldn’t be that surprised.

  • Wimster@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Don’t go to BlueSky !!! They’re not better than X. They obey to the same leaders… MONEY, GREED, AND POWER. A few weeks ago they restricted 72 Turkish protesters the access to their BlueSky accounts on simple request of the Turkish Government. So, BlueSky cannot be trusted they will secure the accounts of their customers. If Trump would ask BlueSky to block all accounts of members who are against him, they’ll do it right away.

    https://www.turkishminute.com/2025/04/17/bluesky-restrict-access-72-account-turk-amid-government-pressure7/

        • Muyal_Hix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Oh boy, where do I even begin:

          1. Federation. People have no idea what it is, which means that they have to familiarize themselves with all these technical concepts just to create an account.

          2. Servers. Most mastodon servers are locked, and you have to petition the admins to let you in, which often implies waiting more than a day. In other sites, you can create an account in 5 seconds, so mastodon is at a disadvantage.

          3. Lack of an algorithm. This implies people won’t see the content they like, which means they have to go and actively look for content. Most people don’t want to spend time doing that, they just want to log in, laugh at funny memes ans look at pretty pictures.

          • moopet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago
            1. The same is true for Bsky but people don’t complain about it there. It asks you what server you want when you sign up, etc., which is what people complain about in the Mastodon journey.

            2. Most people aren’t on locked servers. By which, I mean the majority of mastodon users are on the .social instance which is the default when you sign up on the official app/site and is open to anyone.

            3. Not an accessibility issue.

          • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            8 hours ago

            3 is a feature to me. The “algorithms” seem to create bubbles, and I want to decide myself.

            • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Some people want to make social media account to browse illustration or photography.

              Unfortunately, that’s not doable on fediverse. You follow anyone, and suddenly your feed filled with content that you are not interested in. Example: your favourite artist also post a lot of game screenshoot, but you’re not interested in the games. You just want to see the illustration.

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              6 hours ago

              and bluesky doesn’t have a default algorithm either, but allows you to subscribe to algorithms created by other people

              being able to choose how the information is presented is the way

              • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 hours ago

                That seems like a good way, to give the user the option. In your opinion, are these algorithms transparent enough to understand or even verify for regular users?

                • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  yes and no… essentially they’re http services that people run, so they can either be closed or FOSS… i could see a future where there’s like those 1-click “run on <serverless platform>” on github pages and you can audit the code if you want, and self host

                  they call them “feeds” if you’re interested in going deep

          • Wiz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago
            1. So what?
            2. Damn straight they are locked. Other wise you get Nicole spam on all of them, instead of just a few.
            3. So what?
            • merdaverse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              This is exactly the dismissive attitude that has shaped Mastodon development, and why it will never have broad appeal to replace any traditional social media.

          • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            So, you don’t know what accessibility standards are. You’re just using a term, “accessibility”, to mean “the way that I want it to work”.

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              and you’re just using the term accessibility to mean a11y… the word accessibility is far broader than simply accessibility standards for people with disabilities

    • rational_lib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      BlueSky may not be ideal, but anything is better than X.

      X is just a machine for turning billionaire cash into political domination.

      • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        bluesky is just early twitter, and it wont stay that way for long. they’ve already removed people from there that the Turkish govt doesn’t like and there is nothing at all stopping some billionaire like musk from swooping in and buying it all up.

  • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The right-wing billionaire’s platform has recently lost about 10 percent of its European user base.

    It’s a good start but we gotta pump those numbers up.

    • Sl00k@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I tried moving to Mastadon first a few years ago and it was a pretty shit experience, Bluesky however has stuck in my app rotation pretty well.

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Because Bluesky is centralised. You went from one serial killer’s house to another. You don’t know which serial killer owns your new house, but you’re hoping they’ll be nicer than the previous one. But at least their house is nearly as nice as the old serial killer’s house.

      • excral@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        General advice regarding open source: even if you tried something out years ago and didn’t like it, it may be well worth giving it another shot. Open source projects often need some time to mature and take their time to improve, but only get better over time.

        • moopet@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Which is incidentally the opposite of proprietary products, where if you give it another go in a few years it either doesn’t exist or is enshittified.

    • altphoto@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Or meta because its better? Like getting run over by a small car instead of a bus.

      • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Ewww people actually use Threads? Last time I saw it, it was like LinkedIn 2.0 filled with sigma grindset “chase that bag” crap.

        • altphoto@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I’m.on Lemmy and mastodon. Anything else is pure sarcasm. I sarcastically browse for TV’s on Amazon. But will I buy? No. All have spyware on them, so no. I wouldn’t touch meta with a 300ft pole.

          • moopet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            This is not a particularly relevant comment, but you reminded me of when I was a kid and a friend had a TV on a stand opposite her bunk-bed. She didn’t have a remote control, but she did have a long stick, and she was amazing at pressing the buttons from like 2m away. Proper life skill.

            • altphoto@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              In my day you had to turn the knob. I made a geared motor adapter to change the channel remotely. DIY when I was 10.

      • jackalope@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Threads sucks compared to bsky don’t know what you’re talking about there. Bluesky has way more features and posting quality.

  • Ilixtze@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It’s not just X; American social media has been gradually turning into such a shit show for the last 10 years: censorship, misinformation, consensus manufacture and creeping enshitification. I jumped ship to the fediverse and never looked back!

  • vaguerant@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    22 hours ago

    What’s the quality like of the people who are still on Twitter in 2025? Does the fediverse want them? (These are real questions, I have no idea if there’s still any decent people on Twitter.)

    • ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Every massive influx from Twitter has brought a deluge of people I want nothing to do with in any way shape or form, and a small sprinkling of cool ones. Fortunately like 4/5ths of the crappy ones leave again, but that other 1/5th is a big number when you’re talking an influx of hundreds of thousands.

    • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      22 hours ago

      There likely are (I quit Twitter over a year ago), just because it does unique coverage on many topics.

    • James R Kirk@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      BlueSky is not federated. Also German users have outsized representation on Mastodon but most of the network is outside Germany.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        There is always that one comment saying “b-but its technically kinda federated”. It doesnt fucking matter if its federated if 99.999% if all users are on one instance. The entire concept of a long lived, enshittification resistant fediverse relies entirely on being decentralized with a reasonably evenly distributed userbase. You fucking bet lemmy would already be completely worthless right now if people hadnt stopped lemmy.world from grabbing more communities and users.

  • froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Small chances for now, but let’s keep growing small communities here. People need to get tired of Instagram and centralized algorithms to switch to fediverse

    • foliekatt@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I try to convince people to do “+1”. Like, keep X/insta/reddit or whatever, but every time you feel you have something to post, do the same at mastodon/pixelfed/lemmy. Those platforms are nothing without the network effects, and the network effects will diminish the more people do this.

    • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’d love it if the fediverse could have its own algoithms as long as theyre open sourced and made ethically, like they shouldn’t mess with peoples mental health or cause social media addictions

      • Muyal_Hix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes. People don’t realize algorithms are one of the main reasons decentralized sited haven’t taken off. Most people don’t want to spend time looking for their content, they just want to log in, laugh at funny memes and look at pretty art