Meanwhile, America’s aUtHoRiTaRiAn system means [the bourgeois dictatorship] probably can ride out whatever political or social pain might result from higher unemployment or slower economic growth in a trade war.
in America you can change the political party, but you can’t change the policies. In China you cannot change the party, but you can change policies
Li: At the moment, the Chinese the party state has proven an extraordinary ability to change. I mean, I make the joke: “in America you can change the political party, but you can’t change the policies. In China you cannot change the party, but you can change policies.” So, in the past 66 years, China has been run by one single party. Yet the political changes that have taken place in China in these past 66 years have been wider, and broader, and greater than probably any other major country in modern memory.
Pilger: So in that time China ceased to be communist. Is that what you’re saying?
Li: Well, China is a market economy, and it’s a vibrant market economy. But it is not a capitalist country. Here’s why: there’s no way a group of billionaires could control the Politburo as billionaires control American policy-making. So in China you have a vibrant market economy, but capital does not rise above political authority. Capital does not have enshrined rights. In America, capital — the interests of capital and capital itself — has risen above the American nation. The political authority cannot check the power of capital. That’s why America is a capitalist country, and China is not.
If what were getting is democracy, then I’ll have what Xi is having.
Meanwhile, America’s aUtHoRiTaRiAn system means [the bourgeois dictatorship] probably can ride out whatever political or social pain might result from higher unemployment or slower economic growth in a trade war.
in America you can change the political party, but you can’t change the policies. In China you cannot change the party, but you can change policies
from https://redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/