They destroyed all the fucking unions with their bullshit
The entities most involved with union-busting are the extremely rich people like your friend and NATO states.
They hollowed out the American voice of the worker
I’m sorry, but this is extremely silly, especially considering that it is public knowledge that extremely rich people like your friend have always made union-busting efforts.
If you ignore that part about America. You missed out what happened to the unions in America. Teamsters were transporting heroin for the mob
HAHAHA.
Not that I am a fan of your national chauvinist unions, but this accusation is extremely silly when extremely rich people like your friend have done stuff like use strike breakers.
Not seeing anything about Molly Maguires, and not seeing anything about murdering for speaking out of turn. Also, not seeing any sources in the article.
Not sure why you even decided to veer things into the union stuff, especially considering that unions are one of the few ways in which workers - like yourself, apparently, - can actually fight for their rights, and considering that the extremely rich people like your friend take effort to demonise and sabotage them.
What I don’t understand is when you are going to substantiate your claims.
It’s pretty silly to claim that some nebulous ‘corruption of unions’ is what allows organised criminals to own companies, despite the fact that they can just do that already and with no unions present.
Not seeing anything about Molly Maguires, and not seeing anything about murdering for speaking out of turn.
The sources are just another unsourced barely sourced article and a book called ‘Storytelling Sociology: Narrative as Social Inquiry’, which does not seem to be a work of relevant research.
The entities most involved with union-busting are the extremely rich people like your friend and NATO states.
I’m sorry, but this is extremely silly, especially considering that it is public knowledge that extremely rich people like your friend have always made union-busting efforts.
HAHAHA.
Not that I am a fan of your national chauvinist unions, but this accusation is extremely silly when extremely rich people like your friend have done stuff like use strike breakers.
Removed by mod
Citation needed.
Removed by mod
Nothing relevant comes up. So, citation is still not provided.
Removed by mod
HAHAHA.
Is that what counts as a serious citation for you? Actual fiction?
Also, no such movie seems to exist. Did you mean ‘Molly Maguires’?
Removed by mod
Not seeing that article cite any sources, and not seeing it confirm your claims.
Removed by mod
Nothing about ‘Molly Magreggors’, and you are yet to point to the page about murders for speaking out of turn.
Removed by mod
Not seeing anything about Molly Maguires, and not seeing anything about murdering for speaking out of turn. Also, not seeing any sources in the article.
Removed by mod
Not seeing anything about Molly Maguires, and not seeing anything about murdering for speaking out of turn. Cite the page.
Removed by mod
Hahaha.
Citation needed.
Not sure why you even decided to veer things into the union stuff, especially considering that unions are one of the few ways in which workers - like yourself, apparently, - can actually fight for their rights, and considering that the extremely rich people like your friend take effort to demonise and sabotage them.
Removed by mod
And unions are relevant here how, exactly?
Removed by mod
What I don’t understand is when you are going to substantiate your claims.
It’s pretty silly to claim that some nebulous ‘corruption of unions’ is what allows organised criminals to own companies, despite the fact that they can just do that already and with no unions present.
Removed by mod
Not seeing anything about Molly Maguires, and not seeing anything about murdering for speaking out of turn.
The sources are just another
unsourcedbarely sourced article and a book called ‘Storytelling Sociology: Narrative as Social Inquiry’, which does not seem to be a work of relevant research.