What I don’t understand is when you are going to substantiate your claims.
It’s pretty silly to claim that some nebulous ‘corruption of unions’ is what allows organised criminals to own companies, despite the fact that they can just do that already and with no unions present.
Not seeing anything about Molly Maguires, and not seeing anything about murdering for speaking out of turn.
The sources are just another unsourced barely sourced article and a book called ‘Storytelling Sociology: Narrative as Social Inquiry’, which does not seem to be a work of relevant research.
And unions are relevant here how, exactly?
Removed by mod
What I don’t understand is when you are going to substantiate your claims.
It’s pretty silly to claim that some nebulous ‘corruption of unions’ is what allows organised criminals to own companies, despite the fact that they can just do that already and with no unions present.
Removed by mod
Not seeing anything about Molly Maguires, and not seeing anything about murdering for speaking out of turn.
The sources are just another
unsourcedbarely sourced article and a book called ‘Storytelling Sociology: Narrative as Social Inquiry’, which does not seem to be a work of relevant research.