ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 7 months agoMisgendering rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1114arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1105arrow-down1imageMisgendering rulelemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square21fedilinkfile-text
Note: unless you’re deliberately obscuring someone’s gender and know their preferred pronouns, use their preferred pronouns.
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·7 months ago they really has I still conjugate they as its plural form even when talking about an individual, is that not what most people do? For example: they really have
minus-squareSnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoHmm I guess that does make sense as well. Don’t think I have thought about it that much as when used this way you are talking about an individual. I suppose it is officially grammatically incorrect.
minus-squareshoki@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoi think this is correct, but I see why someone would use “has” to emphasize that they are talking about a singular person
minus-squareSnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-27 months agodeleted by creator
I still conjugate they as its plural form even when talking about an individual, is that not what most people do? For example:
Hmm I guess that does make sense as well. Don’t think I have thought about it that much as when used this way you are talking about an individual. I suppose it is officially grammatically incorrect.
i think this is correct, but I see why someone would use “has” to emphasize that they are talking about a singular person
deleted by creator