borschtisgarbo@lemmygrad.ml to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 6 months agoWowlemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up180arrow-down1imageWowlemmygrad.mlborschtisgarbo@lemmygrad.ml to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square17fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareVapeNoir [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·6 months agoIirc finno ugric languages aren’t actually that closely related to turkic ones
minus-squareErika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·6 months agoYeah basically everyone except the most fringe weirdos agree that Uralic and Turkic langs aren’t related I’ve actually heard a proposal that the Uralic languages are ultimately related to Indo-European but this is a very controversial proposal Sent from Mdewakanton Dakota lands / Sept. 29 1837 Treaty with the Sioux of September 29th, 1837 “We Will Talk of Nothing Else”: Dakota Interpretations of the Treaty of 1837
minus-squareThe_Riddler [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·6 months agothey aren’t related at all, actually
minus-squareSpiderFarmer [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·6 months agoIsn’t the relation super distant anyway? Or was I reading some out-of-date literature?
Iirc finno ugric languages aren’t actually that closely related to turkic ones
Yeah basically everyone except the most fringe weirdos agree that Uralic and Turkic langs aren’t related
I’ve actually heard a proposal that the Uralic languages are ultimately related to Indo-European but this is a very controversial proposal
Sent from Mdewakanton Dakota lands / Sept. 29 1837
Treaty with the Sioux of September 29th, 1837
“We Will Talk of Nothing Else”: Dakota Interpretations of the Treaty of 1837
they aren’t related at all, actually
Isn’t the relation super distant anyway? Or was I reading some out-of-date literature?