The problem is it’s effective. Unless you design a system where the most effective strategy for winning a position isn’t making people afraid of the alternative, it’s just going to come back
deleted by creator
Yes, this is the exact intention of the second amendment. Armed resistance against tyrannical government. If the rise of fascism in America isn’t the time to use it, it’s meaningless.
The founding fathers envisioned state militias that would rival the power of the federal army and keep it in check. That ship has sailed, so it already lost a lot of its bite, but any power it still has can only be justified for that purpose
That’s around 500kg of food, or 70kg daily for a week. All you have to do is eat basically 1 body weight per day
Yes, that’s the entire point of “black lives matter”
He would still own a massive share of the stock
Making it very clear to the world you can’t just march into a neighboring sovereign country and take it over is very important for global security. That matters to all of us. We as a society should not accept that.
Huh, I figured neither movie was a Spielberg movie. Turns out both are
Yes, the US nuking Israel would definitely be less apocalyptic…
All sexual conduct is covered under this law. The issue is they broadly defined “homosexuality” as sexual conduct
“What do you mean that’s a crime? We do that every day back at the Capitol”
They literally just said it’s was 100% due to the information environment you’re in. In what way does that imply stupidity?
“Shit, guys, we got ze missiles, zey are coming, fire our shit!”
“But I am le tired”
“Well, go and have a nap. THEN FIRE ZE MISSILES!”
So the only acceptable way to communicate medical cases is in 2 sentences covering the context and final conclusion? And the only reason for that is that they happened to a real person?
It’s the viewing experience that’s the point. Would you want every murder mystery movie to be named “the killer was X”?
Well…kinda. They’re always technically true, but sometimes it’s like “turns out she actually had aids for years and never knew”
How would your solution be any different than voting for a third party? It would have the exact same problem of being too risky because it probably won’t get enough votes to do anything other than help the party you don’t want to win. Ranked choice is a simple change that could be implemented quickly with some decent support already.
Not super familiar with it, but they have some sort of psychic field that turns their beliefs into reality. Pretty much all their technology only works because they believe it does