Climbing helped. If you say “I’m too old for that” it is joe ver for you already

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34CZjsEI1yU

Screens are not basically buttons. I cannot reach at the screen without looking and find a toggle and know that I pressed it successfully.

It could be run after git checkout and then rustfmt before commit.

If I have a complex regular expression to code into my app, I write it in pomsky, then copy paste the compiled regex to my source file, but also keep the pomsky source nearby. Much more maintainable.

Because not all parts of the repo have this status. Some are stable, well tested and critical.

No it is not. It depends on the codebase - if it is something relatively new, a proof of concept or something that is bound to change soon, there is no point in slowing the development down just because it is “too large to digest”.

Wtf. Go look at the examples. W. T. F.

Ah, yes, the reflog incantation. It is said that it can be performed only by those who have rebased on an hard reset origin.

There is also this: https://www.modernhn.com/

Yeah, switching from reddit to lemmy gives a “old internet” wibe: actual people, most of them technically inclined. But with more adoption, these people get diluted by all other kinds of folks.

Same happened with cypto scene. It started with cythography entusiasts, but now it is mostly tech bros.

I mean, updating the rules would help - clarifying that feeding data to any model / doing analysis on it requires copyright - but I doubt that it would stop companies from doing it. Because it is hard to prove in court that your work has been stolen.

But there is no real way of enforcing the rules. How would be combat piracy? If you make BitTorrent protocol illegal, people will just that using HTTP or anything else to share copyright-ed material.

Interesting, but probably not general and scalable way of fighting this problem. This practice is would be hard to implement for other types of content.

I think that copyright law is inherently unfit for internet. In its core, it is a legal restriction on re-publishing content which cannot be enforced on the internet. It does not prevent piracy or AI companies from collecting data. So I’d say that we should do away with copyright law altogether. This would, of course, remove a lot of incentive for producing content, but I think people would still produce content, even if they are not paid to do it, as long as their basic needs are satisfied. So if we, as a human race, progress to UBI, we can also solve copyright problem.

But if we get stuck in capitalistic age, I guess we have to pretend that information can be owned and legally restricted from redistribution.

Open weights

Meth inks?

Do you think actual sponsored accounts/bots or just indoctrinated people?

I know that Zuckerberg does things that harm society as a whole, but just changing bathroom amenities is not fascist.

This is degrading the meaning of the word.

Although, musk did start with small steps too and I would consider musk aligned with fascists, based solely on his recent remark regarding eu politics.

You in Germany?

Don’t call it “free”, it sounds like you are so out of touch with reality that you don’t know that healthcare has costs.

The word is “universal”. In my country, I paying for healthcare, but not as much as wealthly people here do. That’s the main argument for it: the rich subsidize healtcare for the poor.