If you like roguelites ember knights is awesome as a group of 4

Until the download servers go down and you have a cartridge that’s just ewaste

Huh, nothing changed…

Weird, I guess.

If this is a real thing and not photoshopped, the fact that they feel the need to hide their faces is depressing.

Is the chinese show caught up on the booksnor still unfinished?

Heh, now the parralel in my mind is developpers that put in microtransactions or force a subsribtion model with no option to buy.

Lab grown meat is more efficient, but some place are already outlawing it before it’seven available commercially… So I’m not too sure about the direction we’re going.

Those are very good points.

This specific source doesn’t highlight it and I don’t have the opportunity to find something else at the moment, but when I first heard about it ( in a ted talk that I can’t remember the name of… ) they had highlighted that health complications followed similar curves. The worsts of course being burning stuff due to dumping it in the air, but that most renewables had their lot of injuries too, that their just less publicized.

Here’s my full take of nuclear/renewables

My understanding is that most power grid depending on renewables need an alternate energy source for when power demands ramp up: they need some energy sources that they can tune depending of needs, at the drop of a hat.

Hydro does that, you can let more or less water through. (I happen to live aomewhere where most of our energy is Hydro) Things like wind or solar are more complicated.

As an energy appoint source, I think nuclear is a good fit for some use cases.

The thing is, nuclear problems are big and scary events, but they’re rare.

Think like plane crash vs other transportation accidents: they make bigger news, but they’re actually safer than most other solutions.

Here’s the data: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/death-rates-from-energy-production-per-twh

It does seem that your solar example is the one thing that’s safer than nuclear sccording to this chart though, so maybe you knew!

I know what you’re saying, but sometimes it is just the vocabulary.

I remember a conversation with an older woman remembering fondly going dancing with her gay friends.

The words she were using would be considered slurs today (even if a bit dated) but they were not meant maliciously.

It’s easy to assume bad intentions, but it does happen that it’s just someone that’s not informed of the current “correct” vocabulary, and that’s okay as long as it’s addressed.

Small anecdote: I bought a new Cheverolet Bolt about two years ago.

A couple of months after I bought it there was a recall on the batteries, they had to replace all of them in the car.

They were out of stock for quite a while (I assume because of supply chain issues)

They finally replaced them a couple of months ago.

I choose to see that as a 2 years extension on my bettery life,lucky me!

I worked in groceries story when I was younger.

But funily enough, it’s probably one of the rare times I’d have answered “yes”!

We got a policy here where anything mislabelled under 10$ is free for the first item. Anything over 10$ gets a 10$ rebate.

My understanding is that it was put in place a while ago when stores stopped labelling individual items to keep them in check and ensure that consumers had a recourse in case of mistake.

Source: https://www.opc.gouv.qc.ca/en/consumer/topic/price-discount/store/tip-sheet/

NULL being “no money” by any definition, and the regular price for this probably being under 10$… well, it’s probably free!