

The article mentions “negotiations” with EU but not a deal as the title implies?
The article mentions “negotiations” with EU but not a deal as the title implies?
Yeah, I’m all for anonymity but the quality of the article is so poor it’s like it was published or boosted to undermine the position than actually promote it
The medical system lost its privilege to know everything about me at all times long ago. It’s positively lousy with conservative quacks, who not only lose all sense of professionalism when it comes to gender minorities but downplay cis womens’ medical issues too.
The problem is that this rule gives a member’s judges direct power over another member’s courts and there’s no clear recourse against members that use this power to violate human rights in ways the member’s citizens would normally be protected from
I think if you want 10+ years with high assurance you probably want to burn the data to archival quality BD-R disks (not the dye based ones)
The right spinning platter hard drives might have a decent chance to make it 10 years but there’s a lot of possible failure modes and also a decent chance that when you try spinning it back up it gives nothing but read errors.
For cases for “only” 10-30 years I might pick a pelican-like case inside a makeshift wooden coffin-like outer layer. For longer I’d probably use a metal box like an ammo box inside the plastic case and a stone outer layer instead of wood
we need more of this and less of what that other person is selling
They raided the damn white house anyway. Everything they say is utterly disingenuous, “reactions” most of all
I love grandpa’s actual uwu eyes 🥹
every 20 lines… haha that’s so much… visibly sweating
router: “I’m not locked in here with you. You’re locked in here with ME”
wow, thank you for spreading the word
Where do I sign up?
coming from a conservative media outlet instantly tanks any claim’s credibility imo
but it seems that this method of communication completely drowned out by moneyed interests
12 semitones to .5hz, 24to .25hz, 36 to .125hz
Cents are a measure of difference between two frequencies and can’t be converted directly to hz on its own.
An initial frequency in hz and an offset in cents can be used to calculate a second frequency in hz, such as in your initial question. Using the formula from wikipedia f1 * 2^(c/1200) = f2, we get 1hz * 2^(-100/1200) = .9439hz. Note that +1200 cents is double (2^1) and -1200 cents is half (2^-1) the original frequency
I’ve done this! highly recommended
I would say nytimes has as much dignity as a circus clown but it’s not even funny so what’s the point