Also depends on your variant of English, because North American Biscuits are very different from the rest of the anglophone world’s biscuits. Many of them are unleavened, just as most gods don’t have a strong position on whether you should use leavening at any time of the year, let alone now.

deleted by creator

Windows will never come close to replacing Linux! There’s way more Linux out there than there is Windows.

Presumably you mean on the personal desktop. In which case I still disagree in the very long term. I think at some point Windows will be replaced by *nix based systems in the vein of OSX and Chrome OS.

Wow. .08 is ridiculously lax IMO. I agree punishments should scale by inebriation level but I never expected people to think .08 was too strict.

Coupling is a fucking gem. I’ve still never been able to bring myself to watch the final season that has no Geoff though.

But then you have to eat Tillamook cheese… I has no idea cheese could be so bland before I moved to the NW USA. And orange, for some reason.

When bzr, and then git, turned up and I started using them, I was told “this is DVC, which is a whole new model that takes getting used to”, so I was surprised it seemed normal and straightforward to me.

Then I found out that Sun’s Teamware, that I had been using for many years, was a DVC, hence it wasn’t some new model. I’d had a few intervening years on other abominable systems and it was a relief to get back to DVC.

Regarding the original post, are there really people around now who think that before git there was no version control? I’ve never worked without using version control, and I started in the 80s.

I’m particular our bodies are good at selecting the cells and organelles that are most damaged and decrepit to be broken down for material and fuel for the rest of the body. Makes sense they’d evolve to do that.

When you refeeding after a long fast, growth hormones are released that trigger replacement. So there’s seem to be some rejuvenation and other benefits.

It’s difficult to measure key parts of the process on a still living subject so we have to guess and extrapolate for humans. And other aspects aren’t well explained or understood. So there’s a lot of questionably reliable info and explanations, some of which are plausible. Like this!

why is there no switch to enable type checking at runtime?

Have you got problems this would solve? I’ve done a lot of type annotated Python at scale and I can’t think of an example.

Edit: given nobody in their right mind allows code that’s not checker clean.

Isn’t that crazy efficient? I seem to remember about 0.3mm²?

Way back of you asked Google “38 mpg in mm^-2” it would tell you.

I love that it’s the size of the thread of fuel you would consume as you drive down the road.

Edit: oh no, that’s about right. It’s a diameter of about 0.25 mm. I think that’s what I was thinking of.

It didn’t mention halving a third.

The issue is it’s an LLM. It puts words in an order that’s statistically plausible but has no reasoning power.

floppy drive, hard drive, sechs drive — we got building blocks. Crowd sourcing a joke could work.

Excellent, the punchline is sorted, now we just need the rest of the joke.

Or they avoid the need for that solution by avoiding that problem in the first place?.

I don’t even now how anyone keeps track of them and finds the ones they want. And how can you possibly do that quicker than just going to the page afresh.

Part of working on a project for me is assembling links to important pages. It may be days, weeks or months later that I want to come back and there are the links. And of course, anything generically or regularly useful is just a bookmark as you say.

It really seems like people keep tabs open just to keep a list of useful pages. There are much easier and more effective ways to do that.

Well on Reddit, programmerhumor was mostly populated by people weirdly proud of how bad they are at their job, so I don’t see how Lemmy was going to be different.

I’ve worked in a few startups, and it always annoys me when people say they don’t have time to do it right. You don’t have time not to do it right - code structure and clarity is needed even as a solo dev, as you say, for future you. Barfing out code on the basis of “it works, so ship it” you’ll be tied up in your own spaghetti in a few months. Hence the traditional clean-sheet rewrite that comes along after 18-24 months that really brings progress to its knees.

Ironically I just left the startup world for a larger more established company and the code is some of the worst I’ve seen in a decade. e.g. core interface definitions without even have a sentence explaining the purpose of required functions. Think “you’re required to provide a function called “performControl()”, but to work out its responsibilities you’re going to have to reverse-engineer the codebase”. Worst of all this unprofessional crap is part of that ground-up 2nd attempt rewrite.

What do you think comments are?

These are arguments talking past each other. Sure 1 useful comment and 9 redundant ones can be better than zero, but comments are not reliable and often get overlooked in code changes and become misleading, sometimes critically misleading. So often the choice is between not enough comments versus many comments that you cannot trust and will sometimes tell you flat-out lies and overall just add to the difficulty of reading the code.

There’s no virtue in the number of comments, high or low. The virtue is in the presence of quality comments. If we try to argue about how many there should be we can talk past each other forever.