and make overturning it impossible
How?
and make overturning it impossible
How?
What does Biden have to do with this? Even if he did something about Roe vs Wade getting overturned, they would’ve overturned his action, right?
Caleavefornia
Soviet Union General Secretary Joseph Stalin broke the Non-Intervention Agreement and League of Nations embargo by providing material assistance to the Republican forces, becoming their only source of major weapons.
From August 1936 onward, over one ship per day arrived at Spain’s Mediterranean ports with Russian aid: munitions, rifles, machine guns, hand grenades, artillery, trucks, Soviet agents, technicians, instructors, and propagandists.
What does Luigi’s mansion have to do with this?
I was referring to criminal activities with the shady stuff. Thankfully I haven’t come across cp on telegram, but I know for a fact that there’s drug deals and refund services there. I wouldn’t be surprised if it also helped human trafficking cases.
I don’t care about people buying drugs or scamming amazon, but at the same time I can’t support telegram helping all these malicious actors (whether its petty crime, cp, neonazis, etc) just because it can also be useful to leftists. Its scale and easy of use has something offputting, at least to me. We should also remember that it’s not some tool that was gifted to the left, it’s just an app made by a capitalist that acquired French citizenship.
My thoughts are also incomplete because taken to the extreme you just have to ban all encryption, which is something I’m against, so I don’t really know what can really be done.
Law enforcement agencies should be arresting the people doing those things
The problem here is that Durov is not helping them arrest these people. The whole issue started by him not complying with law enforcement requests.
I understand, and agree, that CP is being used as a boogeyman to manufacture consent for anti-encryption and anti-privacy laws. However, I think it’s also unreasonable to allow a platform at the scope of telegram to get away with no issues because of what essentially boils down to “muh freedoms”.
I wouldn’t support a total encryption ban, or some similar comically idiotic policy. But the whole thing with telegram also irks me. At least force the people hiding something shady to jump through actual hoops instead of just downloading a glorified server-client app.
I doubt it was made up. Maybe exaggerated or it was even an issue because he didn’t comply but that was it. Telegram was absolutely used over other messenger apps for crime related stuff
“We have a majority to extend the eviction moratorium, but not enough people showed up to votes!”
Chat is this real
negotiated ahead of time?
Did they retaliate after Iran’s attack some months ago? I think not, but my memory is foggy
then Israel is getting levelled
By who? The Iranian remnants? Genuine question. Afaik Egypt and SA are friendly to israel, I can see them backing down in the name of de-escalation.
Also, what if instead of a nuke it’s a missile barrage?
The attack is obviously deserved but I’m scared about what happens next.
If israel strikes back, the Iran will also do so. Maybe this is the best course of action, if it leads to israel losing, but if it doesn’t, or it leads to ww3…
On the other hand, if israel does nothing, then maybe Iran will consider this a job well done and back down while the idf stays in Lebanon.
So you’re a communist that denounces every communist project atop an ivory tower, instead of understanding the realities of actually building a socialist society (no magical button that will make us overcome hierarchies overnight, I’m afraid). Sounds like you’re just larping about being a communist
Would you agree with the notion that Iran’s attack was designed to be repelled? That’s what I’ve seen on liberal media and r*ddit. They also believe that it was a showcase attack to save face.
The impact on Israel has been extremely minor, with minimal casualties and zero fatalities.
So, was the attack a failure?
It can if you don’t do a train-test split.
But even if you consider the training set only, having zero loss is definitely a bad sign.
Impressive mental gymnastics. So the “starving” Cubans live more than Americans because Americans have “too much” bread?
Isn’t every law equal? How would that work?