ah, yes, prejudice

wait, what?

We salute you! raises Starbucks to toast

Who you pardon is symbolic for how your law enforcement should behave

For example, trump claiming he would pardon specific people or groups

The opposite is true, by saying what you’ll crack down on (or stop)

Principle

If you say you’re against punching people in the face you can’t punch someone to stop them

I guess, who knows

That face reminds me of something

I don’t get it

It would be fixed capital regardless of the interior design and chairs?

I grew up in a small town in the rockies and one of the developer outfits had a fancy office with this decor

You can elect multiple reps, the quota threshold is just different

Importantly you do need the multi member districts to get the full benefit of these kinds of voting systems and prevent duvergers law

There can be nice people who are bad at tech, just like there’s racist technologists

Just because a group of nice well meaning Lemmy users is willing to suffer the pain of a poorly built app doesn’t mean they should /have/ to suffer through it

It’s sometimes nice to make nice things. Don’t be too much of an HOA, they’re new, it’s not the end of the world.

Just because I’m not afraid of biking with cars, doesn’t mean I don’t recognize that American biking infrastructure is hostile. We could do more to make biking safer and easier. They’ll struggle but they’ll get the hang of it.

So too, with making nice apps to free the lay people from their digital walled gardens.

Knew a church teacher who said “the gays aren’t here so I can tell you something they won’t like, they aren’t going to heaven” (said in front of my gay but religious ex boyfriend xD)

Always assume your comments in a group are made with at least one person you’re othering.

I like the parliamentarian :)

They’re angry about whose resolution to hurt people got taken up

This is a great narrative explanation.