I choose “daft.” Now explain.

What is it I’m practicing?

No, there’s no need for that. I don’t see how banning hammers would help with Internet spam—just the AI will do.

You can’t catch me in a logical trap here, hoefnix, because there isn’t one. I’m mom saying you aren’t allowed to play with silly string in the house; it’s too much to clean up.

Just because you do not agree with what a fraction might do.

Nils, if you cannot explain how this voting-age change is guaranteed to move the country in a Progressive direction, then I am not interested in your whinging.

American ICE is coming to deport you from your country next. You had better have the upper hand when they do. Tick tick.

remove the license from people +50yo. Maybe their voter card as well.
Given their turnout and right-wing tendencies.

Fuck it, sure.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said that 20% to 30% of code inside the company’s repositories was “written by software” — meaning AI.

Nadella gave the figure after Zuckerberg asked roughly how much of Microsoft’s code is AI generated today.

I highlighted part of the article for you.

Perfect.

As an allegedly misandrist, man-feminist critical of Men’s culture broadly, I am telling you this: these are the only two things you need to believe in.

I am tasking you with the responsibility of simply wanting a better society. If you see any person being harassed or chauvenistic or socially ignored because they’re not “in the club,” man or woman, and no matter the debate on which demographics tend to do what more often—if you have the heroic urge to help someone, that’s all you need.

This might sound a bit like I’m asking you to do something you already do, but if that’s true, that’s even better! A lot of people out there think of themselves as heroes but are easily swept away from the call to action by things like the bystander effect or simply not wanting to rock the boat. I believe in your ability to stand up and help people.

Also, I am surprised by your straightforwardness. I appreciate that, lol. :)

Every time he succeeds in womanizing a victim, he has more reasons to stay the same

Okay. Let’s not let him succeed, then.

They are also for keeping ne’er-do-wells away from harming others.

Yes, this is why prison is not an unsupervised room in your own house.

You think the woman can change to be more responsible…
but you don’t think the man can change to be less irritating.

Pulido, if you don’t believe bad people can change, why bother with a society that keeps prisoners at all? Why not just kill them?

But removing AI would solve something, eh? Seems more effective than yours, then.

“people should be accountable for the actions of other people in the same demographic”,

Sudneo! Answer these questions:

Do you agree that stalking women is bad behavior?

If you discovered a person who was stalking a woman, would you seek to intervene?

Don’t yadda-yadda about what the argument was to me—I don’t care. I want the answers to these two questions.

And also start educating the average, shitbag womanizer males to not be that. We could teach them to be normal.

What is your genius solution to handle these naughty users, then?

If you fail to respond within 3 business days, we will continue with our plan to nuke OpenAI from orbit.

I did just re-read it, and yes, kind of.

I guess I just disagree with what it should be called.

Oh.

In that case, I don’t think this is an accessibility I respect.

Skill in any medium is accessible only to those who have been educated in that skill. I get that it’s expensive, but that is unfortunately just how attribution works.

I’m not interested in the musings of a philosopher whose philosophy is written for them. I’m not interested in the artistic expression of someone whose expression is decided for them. Your ideas have to come from you.

If someone wants a colorful backdrop to something else they’re doing, then images are more accessible, but art is not.

What makes it accessible?

I would think a pencil and paper is much more accessible than a thousand dollar phone or computer.

[edit] Is it that people with hand tremors can type instead of draw?

Yeah, I dunno. I wish they would just say sugar or something.

and bad business practices using at as an excuse to lay off staff

Yes, of course, what we need are good billionaires.

Anyone can choose not to fire a gun—I don’t want the gun in the room. If you want the gun for other reasons, then build it to fire blanks.

Are all newspapers firing all artists? No, not at all.

Is this at all because: 1) it is wildly unpopular, 2) it is, for now, kind of shit at its job.

If you are going to hate on AI at least hate it for real reasons.

Peter Thiel, and his incestuous coven of vampires, have funded this machine’s creation to replace newspaper comic artists. Do you disagree? That’s what it did.

Or, do you think I don’t also have criticisms of capitalism.

maybe AI will too one say, who knows?

One can hope.

The key difference here between this and photography, though, is that photography only displaced painters. You can tell by looking whether something is a photograph or not. Usually.

AI is very good and will only get better. When the machine can replicate any style, any subject, 3,000 times a minute: what is left for people to even do? How will you ever know a person was there?

If these tools were built to be honest, such that you always knew when something was generated and when something wasn’t, I wouldn’t have nearly as much of a problem with it.