I bet one lemmy penny that he does a debate. He got out of the republican debates because he was the clear winner, but no federal election debate would show weakness and that would be bad for his brand.

I also think the debates will be an absolute disaster for all parties involved which will benefit trump as his side doesn’t care what he says or does.

True, but he also can’t run in Florida again so I could see it.

I was referring to the perception from the results of the trial by the public, but you’ve given me quite a bit to mull over. Appreciate the context.

Yeah you’re right and I think we’re looking for civily liable instead of conviction in this scenario - not that it should make a difference.

As a native English speaker I fully agree that your intuition makes sense and I’ve also always hated this phrase because it does sound backwards.

This is a good take but it disregards the realities of the financial recipients being unable to account for funds spent. I agree there are special circumstances but we need to have visibility to those realities as benefactors. Otherwise how can we allocate funds democratically.

Lol literally no way to find out because they don’t track it and have no reason to do it.

Or - and this is heavily documented - the US Military has never passed any audit since they began being audited. This is just part of that.

Doesn’t mean we don’t support Ukraine. Just means we need to hold the military accountable for the funds provided.

Thanks for this breakdown. As an American I was confused as to why I found this concerning.

Not an argument at all but rather a discussion on what has been provided. I think we’re both in the same page in terms of support for Ukraine. We can always do more but I just wanted to provide insight into what has been done. Unfortunately the US isn’t all aligned on this issue which causes the roadblock.

From a policy perspective what would you like to see from the US?

https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/

For the context of this article the US has provided 43.9 billion in military aid (defined as military equipment or weapons) as opposed to the UK’s 6.57 Billion. By a large margin that is the most tangible assistance provided to Ukraine than any other country participating. The US could provide more funding, but money is not nearly as useful as already produced and available military equipment in the immediate term. I just hope the US can continue to assist, but Congress won’t pass anything it seems (see the less than 25 bills passed this session).

It’s looking like no one really knows - seeing mixed signals in the recent reporting. They are reporting higher GDP but the concern seems to be projected inflation increases and a possible housing bubble.

When diving into the reporting, I found some interesting nuggets referring to Putin directing his interior ministers toward manual economic controls since 2014. The thought is in mitigating crises (Crimea and now Ukraine). From looking at China, manual controls seem to work in the short term before mistakes set in long term. Curious to see how much longer Russia can hold out.

Yeah I did a bit of looking around recent headlines and see similar sentiments:

• https://www.ft.com/content/b3206a9f-e667-4e53-8a16-a8096188d4ae
• https://www.reuters.com/breakingviews/russias-economy-will-suffer-brawl-top-2023-12-18/

I guess we’ll see if they can dodge another bullet

“Russian economy is about to flip the fuck out”

Just curious, what’s your sourcing on that? I ask because this has been said since the sanctions were put in place but they’ve managed to limb along.