

Agreed, because them majority of them speak for money and not for people.
Agreed, because them majority of them speak for money and not for people.
Tile would be a poster child for this.
It begs to run constantly and acts pissed when you don’t allow it.
Everything old, is new again.
Ah. Thank you, that clarifies things; along with a cuppa java.
Confused? No. Seeking an apt analogy for this situation? Yep. Can you provide one, please?
The 21st century version of a DOS TSR program?
Cops spooked the depth of their perfidious conduct will be revealed; City spooked by thoughts of lawsuits; Civilian review boards will swing in the wind.
Sadly, you’ve linked the thumbnail.
So Jesus’ resurrection jumps around?
This contrasts so well with the other candidate.
No, it’s because their base is generally undereducated and easily triggered. Making conflated bullshit easy to pass off.
Don’t give them any ideas, the tube’s gotten toxic enough lately.
Limit? No, trigger.
Please pass the popcorn.
Nancy Mace, Newsmax, why are you giving them the oxygen of attention? Neither are credible from the start.
Another reason to avoid those plans like the plague.
CCP missed the memo, identity politics is dead.
Tuberville, a politician the Onion loves and Alabama keeps electing.
Didn’t conservatives whine endlessly about “activist jurists”? Def the pot calling the kettle black.