I literally don’t understand how renaming “Victory in Europe” day to “Victory Day for World War Two” downplays the role of allied forces.
It’s… right under the headline.
US president downplays role of allied forces in defeating Nazism, saying ‘nobody was close to us in terms of bravery or brilliance’
This is just the surface-level stuff that people see and get annoyed with. This faux puritanical censorship is also used to blot out content on “sensitive subjects” that would otherwise be informative to people but harmful to the corporate or state image. It’s getting harder and harder for news on the Palestinian genocide to trend before it gets shadowbanned on any platform, just as an example.
Why does he look like…
…in the thumbnail? Actually, I think he is a thumbnail.
Just had every single FAA job I applied for get pulled, so yeah I guess I have the benefit of not having made big life changes before getting fucked over.
“I’m doing my part!”
WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?
Jules Pierre Mao should have stayed on the Guanshiyin.
I wish these were drawn as closed containers
It doesn’t. It’s just how the headline is written. It’d be nice if they didn’t do it that way, but that’s the grammatically-recognized way of doing it.