He’s right. When the bulk of tariffs’ impact hits, it’s going to be much, much worse than it is now.

Yeah an AI emulating you will spout nonsense, because you are spouting nonsense. It’s like shooting yourself in the foot because someone is mocking you.

… witchcraft?

The problem isn’t that we need to get rid of Tate. They are like flies and there will always be more like him.

What we need to figure out is what made him so persuasive to young boys - that’s the real problem. We need to know why young boys are willing to listen to bullshit like his, and we must figure out what we can do to correct that.

Bring them further left how? Why would they need to do anything when you’d vote for them anyways? Every election both parties move a little bit to the right, and you have no choice but vote Dem. What can you realistically do when the only power you have is voting unless you are a billionaire? Your electoral system is truly fucked and the probably of it fixing itself is low, because why would the party in power want to change the system that just gave them that power?

All I can say is leave if you are able to.

deleted by creator

Quite sad the amount of downvotes you are getting, it’s like the dem supporters haven’t learned their lesson yet…

well they can just say their support is so strong that they won despite widespread voter fraud against them. believe it or not, their supporters will eat it all up.

I think you underestimated how much power “executing the law” gives you. And no matter what you believe, it can be immoral to not exercise this power sometimes.

Sure you can educate the populous and hope good people are elected, but you can’t guarantee things always go how you hoped. What if the Congress passes some truly reprehensible law? One you deeply disagree with? e.g. genocide, apartheid, weapons for the oppressor, tax break for the rich, what have you. Would you still hold on to your beliefs and execute the law faithfully? Should you?

While good, national popular vote would only have changed the results of 5 out of the past 50 elections.

I’ve generally been too pessimistic so I’m probably wrong, but I feel it’s not going to make a difference either way. When things get this bad, we are already in the terminal stages of this disease, our predecessors made bad decisions in the past few decades and allowed it to progress to this point. Whether we ban it now or not, are just different treatment plans. The prognosis is not going to be good either way.

I know I know, defeatism is bad and all that…

Yeah that person isn’t even arguing with grok. She’s proud that she’s a nazi…

Wtf

Kinda sad that’s how Richard found out he has dementia

Just do it, okay? I’m so fucking tired of hearing this bullshit everyday. Just do it and get it fucking done with , you fucking imbecile.

That’s… just not true? Current frontier AI models are actually surprisingly diverse, there are a dozen companies from America, Europe, and China releasing competitive models. Let alone the countless finetunes created by the community. And many of them you can run entirely on your own hardware so no one really has control over how they are used. (Not saying that that’s a good thing necessarily, just to point out Eno is wrong)

HTTP 200
{"status": "success", "payload": "{\"error\": true}"}

You still see the old names pop up from time to time in literature and stuff. btw I found a reference https://blog.japanwondertravel.com/the-old-japanese-names-for-the-months-meanings-and-origins-21973

Tesla had camera+radar+sonar, and that wasn’t their own tech - they used mobileye EyeQ back then. When they switched to in house tech they gradually ditched the radar and sonar which made no sense to me. But at the time I saw their lead say in an interview that this is superior and I believed. not anymore.

they said doing so cut costs but obviously lidar/radar/sonar only gets cheaper over time, let alone the extra r&d costs because a vision only system is much more difficult to develop.

And car bombs were involved.

oh, thanks for the correction!