• 1 Post
  • 27 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 20th, 2026

help-circle

  • mote absolutely understands the law, addie is creating and moving goalposts to support their tirade. The person I was responding to made a ludicrous statement, to which I refuted with observable evidence (laws).

    It is obvious to any reasonable person I was referring to and talking about the common folding pocket knife, not kitchen knives or other fixed bladed implements. I may not have written “folding” and it was implied, that could have been better. Your choice to move to some other mental place to complain is your choice, not mine.

    But let’s get to the meat of your off-kilter tirade - what I have stated and am referring to is an anomaly in the world of knives; the locking mechanisms (there are several designs) on a 3" folding pocket knife is there for user safety. If you have owned and operated pocket knives under force, they can and will twist in your hand. And without a locking mechanism, they can and will snap shut on your fingers and slice you up. I know this personally. It fucking hurts.

    I am very aware the UK has banned such an object because they believe it will curtail knife violence. I feel this is trading an actual proven safety feature for “feel good” nanny law that probably don’t matter to someone intent on committing knife violence. It only harms the honest user of the pocket knife who wishes to not mutilate their fingers.

    A three-inch blade is allowed provided it doesn’t lock in place; as long as it just folds away (like a swiss army knife) then it’s fine. Three-inch butterfly knife will get you in a lot of bother, though.

    You go from from a nice pocket knife to a fucking butterfly knife, like holy shit there’s an entire world of cutlery between those two and you jump to some crazy extreme with butterfly knives. Those knives are actually curtailed by laws of their own (switchblades, butterfly knives and other “assisted open” cutlery is vastly illegal in many places in the world) as they tend to overlap with gang violence laws (“public nuisance” in the legal chapters). This is not the same mechanisms or designs as safety locks on a folding pocket knife used by regular people doing regular things.

    The UK outlaws the safety knife (it’s designed for cutting seat belts, smashing a car window and other save your life things) I keep in my vehicle next to a flashlight, because it’s longer than 3" and has a locking mechanism. You are not using this thing for knife violence. (search “spyderco rescue knife”) But, this tool is illegal in the UK because of it’s features.

    So yeah, I understand the law. But I also understand knives and cutlery as I’m interested in the steels used, so just happen to learn other things along the way. And to be fair, other countries have just as stupid laws about other things, including my own. I’m specifically discussing this one law and it’s irrelevant it’s the UK for purposes of discussion of the law itself banning a safety feature.









  • So for OVH I’ve got the EU side, but I’m not flagging that you could spin up in their US or Canada region by accident.

    In effort not to create a large amount of work or overhead, I think the key concern is more what is considered sovereign - these large shops have core presence and edge presence. It is not uncommon that an edge use the features of the core which crosses countries; when I worked in a multinational, our Sydney DC was an edge to the Hong Kong DC core (think like a monitoring or backup system) so your data actually flowed through HKG pipes because Sydney is insanely expensive to have a DC in (size/space).

    Spirit in my comment was more to that - spinning up in US by accident is a “given” to me, kinda obvious. An edge DC routing through a core DC in another country, well that’s a different matter. Can be invisible to the end user.

    If you’ve still got the registrar list you clicked through

    ICANN has a nice page, lets you filter it by country or whatever. There are a million of them, and some of them “feel sketchy” but many seem like generic, boring registrars.

    https://www.icann.org/en/contracted-parties/accredited-registrars/list-of-accredited-registrars

    I then used the DNSPerf data to dig into that layer, tl;dr 90% (guessing) are US controlled. I actually found more out there than what’s on this list but it’s really comprehensive of the big players in the DNS space.

    https://www.dnsperf.com/

    My “investigation” was all manual, dig through publicly available information and follow my nose. The DNS perf listing is actually how I even learned Bunny and Gcore existed.


  • Nice work! A question and a request:

    ref: https://euvetted.com/compare?p=hetzner%2Covhcloud

    (q) Looking at the Cloud & Hosting category, I don’t see a distinction for regional datacenters; for instance OVHcloud has a US counterpart and US datacenters (and Canada) along with all their EU stuff. Just sort of asking how that worked out in your investigations… even if it’s just Canada, it’s not in the EU yet. :) But more realistically say… Helsinki vs. UK or something.

    (r) One of the things I spent time on but I don’t see reflected - Domain Registrars and DNS Hosting. I used the ICANN official list myself and just clicked a lot, and for DNS I found basically CouldNS, Bunny.net and Gcore.com as the “EU” (not sure if EU or general Europe). [1]

    Bunny and Gcore are Cloudflare competitors so it’s no small work to build a full set of data like you have done for others, they all offer a lot of products under one umbrella. But CloudNS isn’t so it’s a crossover area between different types of companies based on singular… features offered?

    [1] side comment, it might be interesting to see a mapping of domain TLDs - it’s well known about who owns/controls net. com, org but I think few realize that a lot of these new TLDs are all owned by single megacorps when you dig into Wikipedia etc. Your precious .dev is owned by Google.






  • My immediate thought: the paperwork system of the world would fail. Correcting an extremely unique misspelled name (let’s say it’s two letters transposed) falls into that weird bucket of “close enough typos” that the OP would never recover. I’d be worried most about the financial systems screwing me over.

    IMHO, best to change to something clearly different so that the paperwork world is given a clear indication of intentional change. Broadcast the intent loud and clear to force systems to change and not ignore it as “some stupid typo.” $0.02

    edit: sorry replied to the wrong comment my bad, meant the parent