(structuring inheritance) before the Jesus Club took over
and then it took humanity another 2000 years to move away from inheritance in favor of composition. you’d think someone would’ve realized sooner that it’s not always the right abstraction…
Language designer for a widely used programming language. Basically I want to be Brian Goetz
What do you think the point of this post is, then? Comedic hyperbole only works if there is still some truth to it
is everyone here a complete beginner? how do so many people relate to this? as soon as you need to do anything halfway interesting the thing just confidently spews nonsense.
Oooh yeah good point. I didn’t make that connection
Huh? What context is this list set up in? I don’t really see how it relates to the medication issue.
That’s not what that page is saying. It’s terrifying enough that it’s a tie, there’s no need to make up fake polling information.
because the earth is big and you don’t have a hard drive big enough to store it locally?
you have what i would consider consistently bad takes on this subject
Ah, just saw a comment from OP claiming that Israel was doing “everything possible” to prevent civilian casualties, so yeah, bad take puts it pretty well. What bad faith bs
This is a decent explanation of gradient descent but I’m pretty sure the meme is referencing the color gradients often used to highlight when something is AI generated haha
is that the one that says “fuck the color blind” because if so hey!! that’s not nice
IntelliJ finds most uses in my experience unless you’re doing something weird with reflection or similar. And if it’s a public facing API only used by the library’s consumers…– it should be used in tests at the very least! Especially if it’s prone to regressions like the comment suggests
Okay, and they would argue that being progressive is never “right”. You refuse to acknowledge the fundamental flaw in your reasoning, which is that you are assuming a moral baseline that – while I’m sure is reasonable – simply not enough people share for it to be a given.
That is your standard, theirs is different. So how do you decide which is right?
There are unequivocable monsters in our society that should be exterminated
And who gets to decide who falls under that? If you ask former (and possibly future) president Trump, the left is “vermin” and immigrants “poison the blood”; his pick for VP is happy to sign off on progressives being called “unhuman”. Should these groups – in their view unequivocable monsters – be exterminated?
Which is what the original commenter already indicated they think as well.
Well, I’m generally very anti-LLM but as a library author in Java it has been very helpful to create lots of similar overloads/methods for different types and filling in the corresponding documentation comments. I’ve already done all the thinking and I just need to check that the overload makes the right call or does the same thing that the other ones do – in that particular case, it’s faster. But if I myself don’t know yet how I’m going to do something, I would never trust an AI to tell me.