Right, that’s kind of what I’m saying, the book mentions a person with a name and location (ish). Then finding a guy there when the name is fairly common does not equate all things said about him to be true. Far from it it seems. Especially if the book has fantastical claims outside the realm of reality about said person and is inconsistent on his story.

At best you get a King Arthur story, was there a king or ruler in said period for (part of) England? Probably. Did he become king because he pulled out a magical sword from the rock? I would assume not.

There are even stories that Arthur never died and will return one day…

Since it was a fairly common name, you might as well say John from Richmond is a confirmed individual.

Here in the Netherlands the “pigeon racing” sport is still relatively alive, but does have an aging target group. Pigeons are driven somewhere many miles anyway, (well km’s) and released, first home gets a price.

There are breeders and trainers etc.

I was looking around for new monitors and many are “smart now too” so you can watch Netflix. I dunno, but I already have a device attached which can do that much better, and more!

I’m still waiting on this Nintendo Revolution 18 years later.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=zX2smM87r14

I don’t know man, if you play Stairway to Heaven backwards it says “Here’s to my sweet Satan” at various points.

This all stems from claims made by Televangelist Paul Crouch in 1982. Crouch claimed on his TBN show that when you play Led Zeppelin’s classic ‘Stairway to Heaven’ backwards, the “bustle in your hedgerow” line of the tune actually says: “Here’s to my sweet Satan/The one whose little path would make me sad, whose power is Satan/He will give those with him 666/There was a little toolshed where he made us suffer, sad Satan”.

https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/satanic-messages-led-zeppelin-song-stairway-to-heaven/

Governments used to want to control the narrative, now they’ll spill out so many narratives that people are overloaded on trying to figure out what is actually true. This has been going into overdrive with machine learning improvements and it’s probably just picking up traction.

deleted by creator

With the shipping containers of money that goes that way great open source alternatives could have been funded to easily get on their level.

The Dutch government at some point after XP was phased out paid millions (which came down to hundreds per computer) for extended support on just that.

Use open source products, and if the software creation is paid for with tax money, the source belongs to the public and should be open source too.

🥵

Showers also work great. 🚿

This post was also posted yesterday, but yeah, with ChatGPT you can execute random code. It is however in a VM of some sorts, so just trying to delete things won’t do that much.

It doesn’t kill the LLM instance, internally it just calls an API to run the generated code on a machine if you ask for it.

https://lemmings.world/comment/12940809

Some offerings like ChatGPT do actually have the ability to run code, which is running in a “virtual machine”.

Which sometimes can be exploited. For example: https://portswigger.net/web-security/llm-attacks/lab-exploiting-vulnerabilities-in-llm-apis

But getting out of the VM will most likely be protected. So you’ll have to find exploits for that as well. (Eg can you get further into the network from that point etc)

Those insurance fucks already were recently like. We’re going to cancel your home insurance, since the area you now live in is too likely to get hit.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/california-wildfire-insurance

Integrated you mean? Into the development environment? 😉

That does seem like a good improvement.

I’ve been on Steam for a while, and it’s mostly winter and summer sales. If only I found the time to play them. 😅