I think that the question of what “understanding” is will become important soon, if not already. Most people don’t really understand as much as you might think we do, an apple for example has properties like flavor, texture, appearance, weight and firmness it also is related to other things like trees and is in categories like food or fruit. A model can store the relationship of apple to other things and the properties of apples, the model could probably be given “personal preferences” like a preferred flavor profile and texture profile and use this to estimate if apples would be preferred by the preferences and give reasonings for it.

Unique thought is hard to define and there is probably a way to have a computer do something similar enough to be indistinguishable, probably not through simple LLMs. Maybe using a LLM as a way to convert internal “ideas” to external words and external words to internal “ideas” to be processed logically probably using massive amounts of reference materials, simulation, computer algebra, music theory, internal hypervisors or some combination of other models.

Can it list available settings that could be changed, because if so it is an almost perfect replacement for the settings app?

Same, the idea of having breasts sounds interesting. Also it could be enlightening to see how much misogyny there is first hand.

Such a shame

What language is that ociloscope?

Nothing is truly unfixable, it just might require kernel modding that no one has done before.

• Intuitively that makes some sense, although would it work if M occured multiple times in [a,b]

You can spoof inei information, but it appears difficult r/privacy thread on the topic.