Barrhaven denizen

  • 2 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle


  • Totally agree about electoral reforms of most kinds.

    Sadly the NDP has drifted far from their socialist root, and doesn’t really talk about any kind of major reform to capitalism. They offer a lot of marginal policy change, but don’t talk about alternatives that would reverse the 50 year trend. When Mulcair was leader, h3me wanted to eliminate the federal deficit.


  • John@lemmy.catoCanada@lemmy.caMark Carney's Economic Plan Released
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think everyone can get behind interprovincial trade. Not much else that’s positive in there. Build pipelines faster, and double down on the fraud of carbon-capture. Nothing about any systemic changes that will help Canadians find housing or secure stable, increasing incomes. Nothing about shifting the share of economic growth from capital to workers. The inflation adjusted incomes of Canadians have be flat since the 1970s, and we are much less secure and have inferior services like health and education.


  • there’s a saying “if it can be done, you can afford it”…it means that money is never the problem for currency-issuing entities, like “Europe”. They always have enough Euros.

    What is needed are the resources to do the thing - labour, material, organization.

    A state can gently steer the resources using money as an inducement. Or it can just do it with power and laws.

    Of course, creating Euros in this way means that the Euros aren’t being created in the same way they are now - which is by paying them to those who already hold Euro bonds, and that makes them upset, and that’s why it will take a while to happen.



  • Sounds good to me. No point leaving a bunch of open senate seats for some future govt to fill.

    I look forward to Trudeau’s many non-partisan senators to blocking a future attempt by Poilievre to bypass the charter of rights using the notwithstanding clause federally. The senate would be right to reject that when conservatives try to advance attacks on whatever marginalized group they want blame for their own failings (probably transgendered people).

    The senate would be right to reject that.


  • family farms are a tiny part of the ag industry. In the US it was under 10%. The image of a pastoral low-intensity 19th century family farm has been drilled into peoples’ minds by food industry advertising for 100 years. People like that image but it’s not real.

    Ag is big business. Loans and leases for land, equipment, inputs, most of the labour isn’t from the business operator.

    There’s probably under 10k family farms in Canada that would be impacted by a transfer to family and they can easily be exempted, it’s chump change for tax revenue.





  • China, India have tiny attempts and smaller successes at influence compared to the thousands of corporate lobbyists that meet with Canadian politicians every year.

    What about the influence of the construction industry? Property developers outright own provincial and municipal politics in Ontario. Big tech?

    Oil?!?

    How about all the huge military and consulting companies that place 50% of the labour in govt workplaces and suck a 25% margin off each one?

    Most of those aren’t domestically owned either.



  • The Canadian govt is the primary creator of Canadian dollars.

    When the federal govt runs a deficit of say $1B, that’s a surplus of $1B in the private sector. $1B more spent into industry than collected in taxes. Good times for the private sector.

    When the federal govt runs a surplus of $1B, that is a deficit of $1B in the private sector. $1B more collected in taxes than spent. This is an absolute disaster for the economy.

    When you consider the above, you can see how ridiculous it is for the federal govt to run a balanced budget or surplus. A balanced budget is a strongly recessionary position, choking off economic growth in the private sector.