I don’t think it’s impossible that the underlying tech of LLMs will be evolved into something undeniably useful. But I don’t think “helping with Python” will be that.
I think on !fuck_ai I can suggest, you could also just learn the relevant bits of Python? Learning to express your thoughts in code and understanding the tools you use feels way more empowering than relying on blackbox-extruded code.
In my book socialism is about workers controlling the means of production, and historical socialists did not agree how that would work in detail.
Libertarianism on the other hand is primarily about the rejection of personal restrictions, stuff like: “I should be allowed to freely copy and share media I have legally acquired.” or “I shouldn’t be forced to pay taxes.” This individualist thinking makes it usually unable to adress structural inequality.
But he also literally has a book titled “Information Doesn’t Want to Be Free”.
That sure sounds like a zinger, but going off Wikipedia he does argue in that book for a loosening of copyright, which is pretty much what I meant. I don’t hate those positions though I’ll note they’re more libertarian than socialist. He has a whole personal freedom + monopoly control shtick, which works great for me in a lot of scenarios, but doesn’t quite work on GenAI tech.
You can call me exceptionalist, but I think LLMs stand out because the adoption of the tech basically requires very capital-intensive and thus centralized operations for model training. This makes whoever runs them (likely capital or a state) a powerful arbiter of information space, maybe best comparable with algorithmic feeds in monopolistic social media.
I think it is necessary to say: “Hey, we as a society shouldn’t run things like that. There are better ways of distributing information that work just fine.” A tech-neutral attitude can’t achieve that.
Funny horse-butt-creature notwithstanding, Dotcorows AI takes have been rather mid. Quoting from Guardian…
In this book, at least, he isn’t animated by the headline-grabbing concerns, whether existential risk or AI psychosis, deepfake porn or election disinformation, because those are unintended consequences. His target is the revenue model and the bubble it has created: “To be an effective AI critic, you need to strike at the source of AI’s power, which is the investment capital it attracts.”
He isn’t falling for AI doom and he is aware of the bubble, which puts him near the better end of the spectrum. But he’s also unwilling to fully criticize community damage resulting from LLM use. That may be because he’s fond of LLMs himself for his text editing and is repping the “it’s just another tool” defense. So he isn’t willing to go all the way when it comes to criticizing the global theft of labour that continues to power this industry. Information wants to be free, dontcha know?
Das musste ich 2mal lesen, befors geschnallt hat. Hoffentlich wird wieder seriösere Politik gemacht, wenn die Spaßparteien FDP, BSW & CDU außerparlamentarisch bleiben.
Dann lass dir verraten, die betreffende Szene dauert ca. 5 Sekunden und passt zu keinem Zeitpunkt zum “editierten” Bild. Das herauszufinden hat kürzer gedauert, als die Antworten in diesem Thread zu tippen. Aber immerhin war uns nicht langweilig.
Kannst gerne versuchen den Frame zu finden, von dem das Bild editiert sein könnte: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/how-do-you-do-fellow-kids
Hast dich wohl verirrt auf dem weg zu !ki_iel@feddit.org.
Die Liste gesperrter Domains fand ich interessant. Einige meiner favorisierten Internetz-Seiten sind drauf 👌.
Hamma denn die blaue absolute Mehrheit? Hab kein Bock Nachrichten zu schauen.
Isn’t evolution beatiful? Each of these specimen has adapted to fit a highly specific niche, it’s knob optimized to predate a specific style of trouser pocket or even certain belt loops.
Das 0,0 gibt’s leider nur in einer Variante, aber früher war ich Team Export.
Wenn ichs mal wieder aufs Festival schaffe würd ichs mir kaufen, um nostalgisch zu werden auf die Zeit als ichs mir ohne Sinn und Verstand so richtig gegeben hab.
This is bullshit and not how pro-Israel influence in US politics works. Kirk was broadly accepted by the republican mainstream and didn’t stray too far from the party line. In fact he was for a while harrassed by Groypers in part because he refused to adopt bald-faced anti-semitism into his rethoric. This theory might well have originated in those circles.
Niedrig-stufiges Freud Meme. Man benötigt nicht mal Wissen obskurer psychoanalytischer Theorie um es zu checken. Komm auf mein Stockwerk: https://feddit.org/post/18456127
Yes we are. Bitches (a.k.a. my wife) be thirsting for this dad bod.
Wow, no upvotes. None of you did, then? Shame, it really holds up well. And you will get my previous comment.
(DM me if you need access.)
So, who else did rewatch Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World recently?
Debian dads of lemmy, join me in an approving grunt.