dat_math [they/them]

  • 2 Posts
  • 114 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2021

help-circle













  • In response to someone saying, essentially, “there is no safe way to run a red light”, you stated,

    "there were the number of accidents went up due to the city putting up red light cameras because the culture at the time was to run reds for a bit after the light changed. When they put up the cameras, people would slam on their brakes and get rear ended. "

    What I understand you mean by this is that there was a culture in which people ran red lights regularly. [Aside: this kind of behavior is known to be associated with elevated fatality rates in urban collisions, especially when they involve pedestrians and cyclists. Choosing to do this kind of behavior is as reprehensible as antimaskery/antivaxxery]. Then, when the relevant government entity began enforcing laws against running reds with automatic camera /radar systems, people began slamming on their brakes to avoid running a red light. This increased the number of rear-end type collisions.

    Did I get anything wrong?

    The reason I said,

    This is far less likely to injure or kill than the kind of collision that occurs more often when people are trying to deliberately run a red light.

    is because shifting the distribution of collisions away from red-light-running-involved collisions, which frequently involve higher speeds than rear-end type collisions, results in a reduction in all kinds of fatal crashes, and a significant reduction in non-fatal crashes. . It is empirically better to have a slight increase in rear end collisions if it cooccurs with a decrease in more severe collisions.

    To be clear, I completely agree with you when you said,

    “Obviously, all of this can be avoided with public transit,”

    but I cannot support the clause that follows,

    “these are the realities of driving.”

    because red light running, drunk driving, speeding, excessive aggression, and other unsafe habits are personal decisions (sure, they’re incentivized and amplified by our shitty automobile-centric system) by which a driver chooses to make other people unsafe (with no care for their consent) to gain at best a marginal improvement in their own convenience.







  • I came here to say mushrooms as well but I think for me it’s as much a direct pharmacological effect on my depression and adhd as it is the accumulation of downstream effects on my mindfulness toolkit/coping skills. I say this because I can feel my perception change and the effort required to exert my attention climb around 9-12 months after my last trip and these changes evaporate nearly immediately post trip. Maybe I wouldn’t experience this if I went back on methylphenidate but the side effects got rough as I got old

    there is some scientific backing to this approach, I’ve learned about later on. psychedelics can help bump you off mental patterns, and mindfulness can help you create new patterns intentionally. the key though is in the combo.

    100%