Bikes are the apocalypse ideal vehicle. They are immensely underrated on apocalyptic media.
Fuel I need to constantly scavenger? No thanks.
Noise that would attract the zombies? No thanks.
The highway is collapsed and my RV cannot go through? No thanks.
A bike would get you quite good through many apocalyptic scenarios.
“La casa de las carcasas”. All Spaniards know it.
Thanks!
Sometimes I have issues spelling these similar looking English words.
What are you implying is the strawman?
The millions of honest and dishonest poor and rich people that prove that morals are not related to money? Or the statically significant lemmings that agree with “all poor are good because they are poor” ?
According to Lemmy poor people who have done not harm to others have the same morals that poor people that hurt others.
I personally know a homeless person that have never steal or hurt. And several poor people with homes but small income that have stab and stolen other people, probably justifying their shit behavior in being poor.
According to some out of touch lemmings those two people are morally equivalent.
Being poor doesn’t justify being a shit person. And defending that is insulting to honest and moral poor people.
According to Lemmy all poor people are good.
Tell that to Juan, the homeless I personally know that has not done anything bad, and have been always an angel. He had never hurt or steal anyone and he doesn’t even have a roof over his head.
But according to Lemmy shitheads that kill, steal and rape have the same moral merit as Juan because they are not rich.
People is bad or good. Money don’t have that much factor in that. It only changes the type of “bad things” you do, but bad people will do bad things and good people will do good things.
Don’t fall for the sentient sentiment that all poor are good and all rich are bad, or that all rich are good and all poor are bad. Because that doesn’t correlate with really.
Yes, maybe a poor bad fella will stab you, while a bad rich guy will deny your medical insurance. They both are taking your life, different approaches to evilness due different disposable income available to do evil shit.
Duck tape it. Because every single product have decided that blinding blue leds is the way to go.
I miss my dim red leds.
We already have power in my city. I think most of Spain is already up. But some cities still down, I think Madrid is still having issues as I have not been able to contact people from there.
Cause still unknown.
Why would they? Getting inspiration or doing something similar to something that already exist is not illegal. And it shouldn’t be. All art is derivative, and that’s ok.
That’s one of the reasons I stopped using YouTube. I don’t want to see people’s stupid face, it adds nothing and it detracts from the video.
This statement have the following fallacies:
Straw man.
Appeal to emotion.
Ad hominem.
Cherry picking.
Not true Scotsman.
Hasty generalization.
Begging the question.
False dilemma.
I don’t think Lemmy accepts pump-dump or nazi cryptos.
More likely they would accept some of the most famous and established ones. Like them more or like them less, but I don’t see reason to ban them. It’s not like paypal or any bank are angels.
Too vague of a description. I would need a more detailed explanation on what happened to define someone as evil.
As some people may perceive things certain way and other people may perceive them other way.
Even when trauma is implied, I have seem people create their own trauma and blame it on others.
So, there’s that. I would need more information before calling anyone evil or good.
If given all info I could conclude that the person purposely or by negligence of a responsibility caused harm to other person then yes, they would be evil.
Henry Cavill, seems like a nice guy, and I think we would have a lot of common interests to talk about.
Reaching means addressing their issues. Addressing one person issues will probably conflict with other person issues. Wich mean that a choose have to be made on to who represent.
Some people are easier to address than other. Some people are more exigent to their representatives than others. Making it not wort it trying to address them.
It’s important to mention that just by “mentioning” people in your campaign those people are not going to vote you. You need to do specific politics that solve the problems they may have. Which is not easy and most of the times it opposes what other people want you to do.
Not all countries are the USA btw. Most countries use their defense budget to actually defend themselves from external very real threats.
I mean, United Kingdom (for instance) it’s not an absolute monarchy anymore, isn’t it?
I started to use firefox back in 2007.
I have never changed back. If someday there’s a better alternative I’d switch. But sure thing that chromium based browsers are not an alternative.